Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) is disillusioned with Taiwan's political scene. Fed up with the constant partisan bickering and lunch-box battles in the legislature, the founder and president of the Lung Ying-tai Cultural Foundation (龍應台文化基金會) — a non-governmental organization (NGO) based in Taipei — hopes to provide an antidote to Taiwan's political chaos through hosting a series of lectures called Taipei Salon (台北沙龍). The lectures are conducted in English.
Begun last year, Lung's idea combines the French institution of literary salons with modern ideas on how to create a civil society — where an informed citizenry is empowered to make intelligent voting decisions, participate in politics and hold government and industry to account.
"[We] want to have an impact on society through intellectual discussion ... away from [the] narrow path of political fighting or reform," Lung said in an interview.
Creating a civil society is something that Lung knows a lot about. Appointed Taipei City's first cultural csar in 1999, during her four-year term she designed and implemented a cultural policy that increased the visibility of the arts in the city. With 15 book titles to her name, the current chair of arts and humanities at Tsing Hua University frequently publishes critical essays in European magazines and newspapers on both sides of the Taiwan Strait.
This month's lectures begin tomorrow with Jean-Claude Poimboeuf, Director of French Institute in Taipei, who will discuss how the French maintain their unique cultural identity in the age of globalization.
On March 17, Pankaj Mishra, a novelist and contributor to the New York Times, will talk about India's path to democracy. This month's series will end on March 24 with Julian Nida-Ruemelin — professor of political theory and philosophy at the University of Munich and a former minister of culture — who will discuss the relationship between globalization and democracy.
PHOTOS COURTESY OF LUNG yINGTAI CULTURAL FOUNDATION
Past speakers include David Plott, the former editor-in-chief of The Far Eastern Economic Review and current professor of journalism at the University of Hong Kong, and Jurgen Gerbig, Director of the German Cultural Center in Taipei.
By conducting the lectures in English, Lung hopes that foreigners will attend the lectures and participate in the discussions.
"I suspect [expats] have been closed up — because of the language barrier — in their own circles, which is not fair because they are citizens of the city," she said. "But so far we have not been able to reach the expat community because we don't know where they are."
Though foreigners are invited to participate, the youth of Taiwan are the real focus of Lung's salon.
"We want to get in touch with the younger generation," she said. "We are disappointed with anyone over 40 — so we decided to carry on a dialogue with people under 40," she added jokingly.
"We want to … cultivate the minds of the younger generation so that they are open-minded ... are concerned about global issues [and] ... have compassion for the weaker, whether in terms of income, resources, or in environmental areas — global citizenship in other words.
Though a tall order, Lung has found remarkable success with Taipei Salon. The last two lectures saw the auditorium at Yuehan Hall (月涵堂) packed to capacity with everyone from high school students to young professionals.
In addition to Taipei Salon, Lung's foundation has also set up a Thinkers Salon (思沙龍), a club with seminars conducted in Chinese that exposes participants to different cultures throughout the world. Under the title "What you do not know" (你所不知道的), it has covered topics such as Latin America, North and South Korea and the conflicts between the Israelis and Palestinians.
By doing so, Lung believes the youth of Taiwan will come to see they have the power to create an efficient civil society, thus furthering the island's democratization.
"We have to … focus on the younger generation and that kind of idea leads us to do what we are doing now," she said.
June 23 to June 29 After capturing the walled city of Hsinchu on June 22, 1895, the Japanese hoped to quickly push south and seize control of Taiwan’s entire west coast — but their advance was stalled for more than a month. Not only did local Hakka fighters continue to cause them headaches, resistance forces even attempted to retake the city three times. “We had planned to occupy Anping (Tainan) and Takao (Kaohsiung) as soon as possible, but ever since we took Hsinchu, nearby bandits proclaiming to be ‘righteous people’ (義民) have been destroying train tracks and electrical cables, and gathering in villages
Dr. Y. Tony Yang, Associate Dean of Health Policy and Population Science at George Washington University, argued last week in a piece for the Taipei Times about former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leading a student delegation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that, “The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world” (“Ma’s Visit, DPP’s Blind Spot,” June 18, page 8). Yang contends that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a blind spot: “By treating any
This year will go down in the history books. Taiwan faces enormous turmoil and uncertainty in the coming months. Which political parties are in a good position to handle big changes? All of the main parties are beset with challenges. Taking stock, this column examined the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) (“Huang Kuo-chang’s choking the life out of the TPP,” May 28, page 12), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) (“Challenges amid choppy waters for the DPP,” June 14, page 12) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) (“KMT struggles to seize opportunities as ‘interesting times’ loom,” June 20, page 11). Times like these can
Swooping low over the banks of a Nile River tributary, an aid flight run by retired American military officers released a stream of food-stuffed sacks over a town emptied by fighting in South Sudan, a country wracked by conflict. Last week’s air drop was the latest in a controversial development — private contracting firms led by former US intelligence officers and military veterans delivering aid to some of the world’s deadliest conflict zones, in operations organized with governments that are combatants in the conflicts. The moves are roiling the global aid community, which warns of a more militarized, politicized and profit-seeking trend