Everyone's a photographer nowadays. Since cameras became digital and then morphed into phones, taking pictures has become as commonplace as making a telephone call. More does not necessarily mean better, however, and a free open-air exhibition about Tibet brings this point home.
A Photographic View of the Sacred Snowland (雪域聖境) "commemorates the 40th anniversary of the establishment of Tibet Autonomous Region" according to organizers from the China Association for Preservation and Development of Tibetan Culture. They invited photographers from Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macau and China to record their impressions of the land and its people.
Part of the "24-hour" series of exhibitions that began here in 2002, the photographers were on this occasion given a week to snap their shots, given that Tibet is so large and varied. The exhibition is also presented in an innovative way. Prints are displayed 24 hours a day in covered booths, at the Zhongshan Hall (中山堂) plaza.
PHOTOS COURTESY
The result is, as to be expected, a colorful collection of pictures. After all, Tibet provides an impressive canvas for the man (they all were) behind the lens to select, frame and capture arresting images. The question is: what separates a great photograph from snaps taken by tourists or even journalists?
Talking to passers-by yesterday some voiced the opinion that many of the photos appeared to be no different to National Geographic-type pictures we have seen before. There are the typical wide-angle views of the Himalayas and colored ribbons fluttering in the wind at Lhasa. There are also shots of tourists taking photos of historical sites.
A Leica-toting Lee Kun-yao (李方方土垚) wondered if the exhibition showed the "real Tibet," as opposed to what the Tibet tourism board would like us to see. "Maybe because I'm a photographer I'm expecting more of a vision rather than just common images," the bank worker said.
David Yuan, a visiting computer worker from Chicago, said a recent exhibition he visited showed off a side of southwestern China he had not been aware of and was therefore a revelation. "Photographic art," he said, "should not be like journalism. It should be more than that."
Many of the images in Sacred Snowland reinforce one's impressions of Tibet as a pristine and spiritual environment, rather than reveal a side of Tibet we have not seen before.
Examples of these kinds of pictures are those of Taiwan's top photographer Chung Yung-ho (鐘永和), whose works can be found in the Taipei Fine Arts Museum and elsewhere. His Tibet series of photos, however, did not stand out. They had a tourist's-eye view of the landscape and temples.
One of the advantages of this type of exhibition is that one can compare photographers. Most impressive, perhaps, was Chen Haiwen (陳海汶), from Shanghai. Perhaps he knows the region better, because his photos showed a deeper understanding and were works of art that no camera-phone tourist or visiting journalist could achieve. It takes time, expertise and impressive equipment to do this.
His shot of Sera Monastery has a wonderful coloration, with ruddy browns and a hundred shades of granite gray, as the dilapidated buildings merge into the mountainside. Sunlight dapples the mist and focuses in an orange light on two priests. Right time, right place, great subject and technical mastery make this an outstanding photo.
As for the setup of the exhibition, covered booths got a thumbs up from those who were asked and their 24-hour presence provides a great opportunity for anyone to view these photographs at all times of the day. Question to organizers: Why not provide lighting so they can be seen at night?
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50