If you expect architecture biennales to be filled with lots of boring wall texts and models, think again. The Taiwan Pavilion (housed in the prison near the famous Bridge of Sighs) at this year’s Venice Biennale, curated by Roan Ching-yueh (阮慶岳), the assembled installations show that the world of architecture is rapidly changing with people realizing we must tend to our small gardens rather than impose heroic monoliths in city centers. So instead of showing grandiose architectural schemes, Roan gathered a variety of voices that show the strength of small-scale, humanizing architecture in Taiwan.
Upon entering the Taiwan Pavilion, one encounters You Yuan (遊園), a beautiful simulation of a Chinese rock garden whose ground consists of glittery pieces of crushed glass and large stones made from recycled glass. A swing set in the corner transforms this interior prison space into a meditative garden that is entirely created from urban waste.
This installation by Helsinki-based Marco Casagrande who had taught at Tamkang University stirred some local controversy. Newspapers such as the Minsheng Daily had a field day in criticizing the choice of non-Taiwanese (ie. foreigners) to display their work in the coveted main exhibition room while Taiwanese architects were relegated to smaller rooms. It is to Roan’s credit that he recognizes that architecture in Taiwan is not limited to those with Taiwanese blood coursing through their veins. This strategy paid off as hordes of visitors including European TV crews were fascinated by this exhibition.
PHOTO COURTESY OF ROAN CHING-YUEH
Norway-based 3RW Architects showed several videos titled Urban Farmers that included interviews of people in Taiwan and Norway who are trying to eek out a living as farmers in a rapidly industrializing world.
Huang Sheng-yuan’s (黃聲遠) Field Office, a team of architects, work only 15 minutes driving distance from their office in Ilan, preferring to tend to their own backyard. For their participation in Venice, they set up benches that seem to have been plunked down in a rice paddy, so that viewers can contemplate life in a small town agricultural society.
Socially-minded architect Hsieh Ying-chun (謝英俊) lives and works in Nantou, Taiwan and China. His new project called Sustainable Construction links society with the economy and the environment. As he was in China helping farmers build their own homes, he was discussed his ongoing project with visitors via a video link.
In Timescapes, young Tainan-based architect Liu Kuo-Chang (劉國滄) uses suspended hand-made rocks to convey the sense of drifting in the ocean. If you are not able to make it to Venice, the exhibition will come to Taiwan next year.
Unfortunately politics reared its ugly head in this innocuous gathering of architects. When Roan tried to organize a panel discussion between East Asian architects, the Chinese architects said they were unfortunately unable to set foot in the Taiwan Pavilion, so when he proposed to rent out a hotel room with his own money the Taiwanese organizers threatened to pull the plug on his budget, so the discussion took place without the participation of the Chinese architects.
Politics are definitely not on view at Taipei’s Museum of Contemporary Art. Artists Today@MOCA 2006, the current exhibition of three Taiwanese artists provides a chance to see lighthearted whimsical works that please the eye and tickle the fancies.
Chen Hui-Chiao’s (陳慧嶠) Here and Now tactile installation consists of her signature use of a bed, needles and thread to create a dreamy walk-through set. Twin brothers Chang Geng-hwa and Chang Keng-hau’s Screw it! consists of toys, baby heads in bird cages, and interactive animations. The second floor is reserved for Ku Shih-yung (顧世勇), a versatile artist working in a wide range of media creating works that are guaranteed to put a smile on your face.
This year will go down in the history books. Taiwan faces enormous turmoil and uncertainty in the coming months. Which political parties are in a good position to handle big changes? All of the main parties are beset with challenges. Taking stock, this column examined the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) (“Huang Kuo-chang’s choking the life out of the TPP,” May 28, page 12), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) (“Challenges amid choppy waters for the DPP,” June 14, page 12) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) (“KMT struggles to seize opportunities as ‘interesting times’ loom,” June 20, page 11). Times like these can
June 23 to June 29 After capturing the walled city of Hsinchu on June 22, 1895, the Japanese hoped to quickly push south and seize control of Taiwan’s entire west coast — but their advance was stalled for more than a month. Not only did local Hakka fighters continue to cause them headaches, resistance forces even attempted to retake the city three times. “We had planned to occupy Anping (Tainan) and Takao (Kaohsiung) as soon as possible, but ever since we took Hsinchu, nearby bandits proclaiming to be ‘righteous people’ (義民) have been destroying train tracks and electrical cables, and gathering in villages
Dr. Y. Tony Yang, Associate Dean of Health Policy and Population Science at George Washington University, argued last week in a piece for the Taipei Times about former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leading a student delegation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that, “The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world” (“Ma’s Visit, DPP’s Blind Spot,” June 18, page 8). Yang contends that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a blind spot: “By treating any
One of the biggest sore spots in Taiwan’s historical friendship with the US came in 1979 when US president Jimmy Carter broke off formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan’s Republic of China (ROC) government so that the US could establish relations with the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Taiwan’s derecognition came purely at China’s insistence, and the US took the deal. Retired American diplomat John Tkacik, who for almost decade surrounding that schism, from 1974 to 1982, worked in embassies in Taipei and Beijing and at the Taiwan Desk in Washington DC, recently argued in the Taipei Times that “President Carter’s derecognition