The Remasculinization of South Korean Cinema derives its title from a book published in 1989 by Susan Jeffords called The Remasculinization of American Culture. This argued that Hollywood used the Vietnam War as a springboard for putting back in place male ideals of aggression that had been extensively challenged during the 1960s. The hippies had put flowers in their hair, adopted a vegetarian diet, and opposed the Vietnam war with songs of peace and love. Hollywood, for which we can read "American capitalism," sought to turn the tide and return to business as usual -- the morally-approved slaughter of men and animals on an often massive scale.
Why capitalism likes machismo and a culture of death is something scholars and thinkers have been discussing for over a century. Weapons-sales and the ruthless exploitation of natural reserves are certainly very big business, whereas consideration for the inhabitants of the Third World, let alone animals, only spells the squandering of national assets accrued over the centuries on the numberless hordes of the speechless and the very poor. Similarly, women must be kept in a subordinate position lest their gentler natures begin to argue against war, the violent despoliation of nature, and the culture of death in general.
What this book argues is that South Korean cinema experienced a renaissance in the 1990s during which the dominant and often aggressive role of the male in South Korean society was challenged. Key male figures in these films were portrayed as anxious, uncertain of their direction, easily influenced by women, and in some cases actual masochists. Today, by contrast, the Rambo-style male is back in fashion. South Korean films, and especially South Korean TV series, may still be very popular in the rest of Asia, and notably so in Taiwan, but the innovative era this book aims to describe is over and done with.
The author chooses to focus on three South Korean film directors -- Jang Son-woo (first film 1986), Park Kwang-su (first film 1988) and the somewhat younger Hong Sangsoo (first film 1996). Representatives of the "remasculinized" style are the highly controversial -- some say unacceptably violent -- Kim Ki-dok and the more philosophical but also sometimes blood-soaked, Kang Che-gyu. Both of these started directing films in the mid-1990s.
South Korean films are not all easy to come by, but titles that receive considerable coverage in this book are Jang Son-woo's A Petal, Park Kwang-su's A Single Spark, Hong Sangsoo's The Day a Pig Fell into the Well (all of which were released in 1996), plus Kim Ki-dok's A Bad Guy (2002) and Kang Che-gyu's Shiri (1999).
Kyung Hyun Kim analyzes his chosen films with reference to academia's usual gurus, names such as Jacques Derrida, Roland Barthes, Gilles Deleuze and Jacques Lacan. Hong's The Day a Pig Fell into the Well, for instance, tells the story of a businessman who makes a long bus journey, subject to many delays, then has to stay longer than he'd planned at his destination. To Kim this stands for the principal of the problem of time, what to do with life after the often violent confrontations of South Korean life ended in 1999 with the democratic election of a new president. This film, in other words, represents South Korea in its "postpolitical" phase.
But Hong deserves his place among the author's "non-remasculinzing" directors because his principal character is victimized even by a prostitute after he finds they've used a defective condom. Whether the film is funny, ironic, deliberately bathetic and so on is, in other words, skated over in favor of a more rigorous, but perhaps not always relevant, theoretical analysis.
This doesn't mean that this book has no interest for the ordinary cinema-goer. It's probably the most substantial tome to have appeared on its subject, even though it looks no further than 2002, despite being published only last year. A film it might have fruitfully considered in the context of violence and machismo is Kang Che-gyu's 2004 movie Blood Brothers (Taigu Ki) about two brothers who fight each other on opposite sides in the South Korean War.
The book is also interesting for another reason -- its footnotes are often more interesting than the main text. This is probably because they are less cluttered with psychological and literary theory, and instead contain nuggets of anecdotal and factual information. Some of these, taken more or less at random, are that forced conscription was at one time used by the South Korean state to punish political demonstrators, rapes are unusually common in South Korean movies, the Hong Kong gay film Happy Together still cannot be publicly screened in South Korea (or could not up to 2002), South Korea is the world's third largest manufacturer of pianos, and Taiwan was once
described, by Frederick Jameson, as "a post-Third World country that can never really join the First World."
Psychoanalytic interpretations, incidentally, abound. Trains are phallic symbols, especially when entering tunnels, as are most other longish objects. This can get rather wearying, but is part of the author's determined push towards uncovering meanings that lie beneath ostensibly simple
narratives. You can't, after all, make much of a book by simply telling the films' stories (though Kyung does plenty of that as well).
This, in other words, is a work that can be exasperating but the heart of which is in the right place. Illustrations, incidentally, are plentiful and interesting. One boasts the enticing caption: "A writer releases his guilt, while a woman bids farewell to shame." The accompanying still is no less intriguing.
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50