London Mayor Ken Livingstone is nothing if not confident. His latest scheme to bring Formula One racing to the city's West End looks like a madcap stunt, but a straw poll taken by the city's Evening Standard last week found almost three-quarters in favor.
The "cheeky chappie" of Labour politics has played all his cards right since splitting with the party in 2000 to contest the mayoral election as an independent.
Livingstone would be a "disaster" for London, Prime Minister Tony Blair opined, backing the decision to throw the rebel out of the party for five years.
"Red Ken" went on to win handsomely. He promptly embarked on policies, like charging for cars to enter the center, that many said would make Blair's prophecy come true.
Bolshie Londoners would simply boycott the five-pound congestion charge, and the technology was in any case not up to the job, they said. The objectors have since quietly eaten their words.
Likewise his decision to pour money into buses, seen by many Brits as the transport of the poor and unemployed, appears to have paid off.
Buses are more frequent and are running to schedule, prompting Londoners to take to them in droves. The capital's buses are carrying more passengers than at any time since the 1960s, with the number topping 6 million on one day in April.
Earlier this year, Blair was forced to retract and bring the mayor back into the party, overriding the grumbles of many senior party stalwarts.
"I am fundamentally and irretrievably against it. Ken Livingstone has only ever belonged to one party -- the Ken Livingstone party," former Labour leader Neil Kinnock said. He was overruled.
Livingstone has indeed always been his own man. He ran London as head of the Greater London Council from 1981 to 1986, during Labour's darkest hour.
Many Londoners recall his battle with the Conservative prime minister of the day, Margaret Thatcher. It was one of the few he lost.
To Thatcher's disgust, Livingstone hoisted a tatty banner with the number of the city's ever-rising unemployed on the roof of the GLC offices, directly across the Thames from the House of Parliament. She repaid this slur on her policies by shutting down the GLC altogether.
London was forced to do without a central governing body, and Livingstone retreated to the back benches of the House of Commons, where party leaders thought they had effectively buried him.
The party hierarchy fought hard to keep him out of the contest when Blair's government set up a Greater London Assembly and called city elections in May 2000, but Livingstone's popularity was decisive. He beat the official Labour candidate into a humiliating third place.
Once in office he set about modernizing the city with all the powers at his command. The private car, allowed free rein throughout the Thatcher years, was firmly in his sights.
Livingstone has also improved grimy London's appearance by pouring money not only into the West End but also into the poorer boroughs that rim much of the inner city.
Pavements were widened, trees planted, landmarks like Trafalgar Square pedestrianized and the privatized bus services induced by means of hard cash to increase their services.
Since taking office, Livingstone's methods have been true to his maverick image -- nothing is taboo.
He has abandoned the radically leftist policies of his immature years to link hands with the city's financial bosses in promoting high-rise buildings and business-friendly policies.
Returning to his leftist roots, he went out of his way to insult US President George Bush during his state visit last year, much to Blair's disgust, and he has been a fervent critic of Blair's foreign policy.
Earlier this year local elections through much of the country saw Labour severely punished for Blair's Iraq policy, but Livingstone, running this time on an official party ticket, was returned comfortably, albeit on a reduced majority.
Londoners remain faithful to their mayor, although some are skeptical of his grandstanding.
Livingstone is campaigning hard to bring the 2012 Olympic Games to the city, despite serious doubts that the transport network could cope, even with significant investment.
And now the bizarre notion of Formula One cars howling down the Mall, the route the queen takes for processions of state with her mounted guardsmen and colorful military bands, has tickled the public's fancy.
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50