The skywalk is gone; How can my two actors encounters each other? seems to be the question being asked by director Tsai Ming-liang (蔡明亮) in the sentimental short film, The Skywalk is Gone (天橋不見了), which will be screening at Taipei's Cinemark cinema at the Living Mall (京華城喜滿客) today.
This is the first time that a 22-minute short is having an independent cinema release.
For the director's many fans, the language of Tsai's films continues lucid and rich in this short work, even though Taipei remains a cheerless place and his characters rarely have a chance of happiness. He does not, however, cater so well for those coming to his work for the first time.
PHOTO COURTESY OF TSAI MING-LIANG
In fact, Skywalk is really an extension of What Time is it There? (
In What Time is it There? the female protagonist, Hsiang-chi (
She hangs around Taipei Railway Station and the Mitsukoshi Department store, walking aimlessly. She comes across a woman who drags a huge suitcase. Hsiang-chi follows her. Then both are stopped by a policeman for jay walking. The woman argues that she wanted to take the skywalk, but it is no longer there.
And Hsiang-chi continues searching for Hsiao-kang, but can find no trace of him.
For director Tsai, Taipei is a rapidly changing city. Every 10 years, old memories are wiped away and places acquire a new look. Perhaps it is not too much of a coincidence that each of Tsai's films have landmarks that have since disappeared.
"It seems that many places that I shot for my films have vanished. This is kind of worrying!" said Tsai jokingly.
It's self-referential natures makes Skywalk somewhat difficult to understand, but Tsai maintains high production values and the short film is filled with precise shots, beautiful photography and good performances.
This year will go down in the history books. Taiwan faces enormous turmoil and uncertainty in the coming months. Which political parties are in a good position to handle big changes? All of the main parties are beset with challenges. Taking stock, this column examined the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) (“Huang Kuo-chang’s choking the life out of the TPP,” May 28, page 12), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) (“Challenges amid choppy waters for the DPP,” June 14, page 12) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) (“KMT struggles to seize opportunities as ‘interesting times’ loom,” June 20, page 11). Times like these can
June 23 to June 29 After capturing the walled city of Hsinchu on June 22, 1895, the Japanese hoped to quickly push south and seize control of Taiwan’s entire west coast — but their advance was stalled for more than a month. Not only did local Hakka fighters continue to cause them headaches, resistance forces even attempted to retake the city three times. “We had planned to occupy Anping (Tainan) and Takao (Kaohsiung) as soon as possible, but ever since we took Hsinchu, nearby bandits proclaiming to be ‘righteous people’ (義民) have been destroying train tracks and electrical cables, and gathering in villages
Dr. Y. Tony Yang, Associate Dean of Health Policy and Population Science at George Washington University, argued last week in a piece for the Taipei Times about former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leading a student delegation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that, “The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world” (“Ma’s Visit, DPP’s Blind Spot,” June 18, page 8). Yang contends that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a blind spot: “By treating any
One of the biggest sore spots in Taiwan’s historical friendship with the US came in 1979 when US president Jimmy Carter broke off formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan’s Republic of China (ROC) government so that the US could establish relations with the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Taiwan’s derecognition came purely at China’s insistence, and the US took the deal. Retired American diplomat John Tkacik, who for almost decade surrounding that schism, from 1974 to 1982, worked in embassies in Taipei and Beijing and at the Taiwan Desk in Washington DC, recently argued in the Taipei Times that “President Carter’s derecognition