The boy wizard is back and none too soon for Harry Potter fans. Both book and movie hit the jackpot the first time around, so that even though the first film ran for 152 minutes, many people still felt the need for more of the same. Director Christopher Columbus has certainly not lost his touch. The magical effects and the great yarn are all laid out before us, and with a lavish generosity. It is a bigger, richer and more engrossing helping than he gave us the first time around. But this is really part of the problem with Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. There is simply too much of it. And the story gets lost in the telling.
To get through the inordinate complexities of the second installment, Columbus is forced to drop almost all exposition. Admittedly it is safe to assume that large numbers of people are all too familiar with the basic elements of Harry Potter, his friends, his school, and the dark wizard who is his mortal enemy, but for those benighted enough to have missed out on one of the biggest publishing events of the 21 century, little or no effort is made to bring them into the picture.
For people who have read the book, Columbus' work serves as a whiz-bang graphical companion piece. But many of the more whimsical aspects of the work, which is what made the book's appeal reach beyond a child audience, have been omitted. While nothing detracts from the pleasure of watching Richard Harris, Maggie Smith, Alan Rickman and Robbie Coltrane do their stuff, the pity is that they have so little screen time as Columbus rushes to package the plot and still leave room for the special effects, which are a major element.
The three main characters, Harry, Ron and Hermione continue to do a splendid job, but Radcliffe is beginning to show his age -- if you can say that of a 13 year old -- and the childlike qualities that made him appealing without being cute seem to come less naturally in Chamber of Secrets. It is accepted that with each book Harry matures one year, but his hormones seem to be getting a little ahead of the filmmaker's schedule and the danger of his sudden jump into spotty and unappealing adolescence seems to present a much greater danger than whatever lies in the chamber of secrets.
While the Harry Potter books are not exactly miracles of subtle character development, Rowling is a skilled craftsman and does give us intriguing glimpses of hidden depths to various characters. Rickman's Severus Snipe is a prime candidate for more detailed characterization, but Columbus reduces this character to no more Rickman's sneer. The strains of over-compression can be seen as the demands of plot, characterization and cinematic prestidigitation all clamor for space.
What will happen with the Goblet of Fire, a considerably more bulky tome that is supposed to hit the screen in 2005, one wonders?
One of the problems with the film as a medium for telling a story is the primacy that the special effects have over anything so mundane as narrative complexity. There is no denying that the effects are really superb -- watch out for the repotting of mandrakes, am ingeniously understated use of awesome computer graphics -- but they do have a tendency to get in the way. The quiddich match looks set to become a technical set piece, and its brilliance in Chamber of Secrets only emphasizes the enormous emphasis that the makers put on technology. It is as if they already had the computer game in mind before making the film, and with almost simulations release in Taiwan, it is hard to get away from the suspicion that the whole thing is just one giant merchandising conspiracy.
While much has been made of Columbus' faithfulness to the book, one cannot help but feel this is ultimately rather superficial. Little effort is spent on creating the world of Hogwarts (its play on the English public school system is one of the delights of the book) which gets short shrift, as indeed does the web of interpersonal relationships between teachers and students. The whole thing is a mad rush to get through the plot, and atmosphere is an early victim.
While it might be unfair to criticize the film on a personal reading of the books, the extent of the hype and the unspoken assumption that the film is a big event courts attack. The fantastic work of the computer graphic artists who have created Potter's magical world has only a tenuous relation to cinematic language. Neither does Columbus have the distinction of George Lucas of creating an indelible part of modern culture with Star Wars, however one might reject the over-burdened and increasingly fatuous development in the prequels. Ultimately, it is hard to get over the fact that these much-hyped films, for all their technical wizardry and splendid casts, are superfluous.
Unable to give greater depth to the story -- just telling it is more than the film can manage -- Columbus makes do with more effects (more things than whiz around and crash). While he has created a visual treat that is supposedly darker than the Philosopher's Stone, it is little more than a confection.
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50