US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has said that China tried to prevent US state governors from congratulating President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) on her electoral victory last month.
He reminded the governors that China is exploiting the US’ open society to infiltrate the country, and is extending the level of infiltration from local to federal government.
This is something that Taiwanese have long had to deal with, and now the US is coming to realize the threat presented by China’s sharp power.
China’s reach does not stop at single countries or a minority of nations; it is a global phenomenon.
Nowhere is this more explicitly manifested than its control of international organizations and its distortion of international regulations.
The purpose of the UN is to maintain peace and yet Beijing’s hegemonic ambitions have been laid bare since China’s rise.
Not only has it inserted considerable numbers of its own people into international organizations, it has also sought to interfere in their operations, and the original remit of many international organizations has been severely contorted.
Chinese have positions in virtually all UN agencies and their affiliate entities, not only as senior officials, but also increasingly mid-to-lower ranking public officials.
It is perfectly acceptable for public officials to maintain the interests of their own country, but when officials from different countries take up positions in international organizations they should not place their own country’s interests over that of the work of the international organization.
Unfortunately, when Chinese join international organizations they tend to use these positions to benefit their own national interests and try to promote China’s policies.
People have seen this in the way the UN denies participation in its forums by Republic of China (ROC) passport holders, or when Interpol issues a red notice that lists well-meaning Xinjiang exiles as terrorists or the UN Human Rights Council is forced to shelve human rights cases in countries with poor human rights records.
The COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan is another example. Taiwan’s healthcare standards are world-class and the crowdsourced global database Numbeo ranks Taiwan first in the world in terms of its health insurance metrics.
Yet the WHO has not only refused to allow Taiwan to join it, it also lumped Taiwan’s cases of people infected with the virus with those of China, while praising Beijing for its handling of the outbreak.
Even before this, the US, feeling that the UN system is becoming obsolete, has been systematically withdrawing from international organizations and treaties.
The US’ withdrawal will only help China extend its influence in international organizations, which would not be conducive to world peace.
The international order is being reshaped by events such as China’s rise and Brexit, and the US, instrumental in the creation of the post-World War II international order, needs to reflect deeply about the need for restructuring it, especially with the creation of core values of good governance within its Indo-Pacific strategy.
Rather than withdraw, the US should take the lead in forging a new democratic, rules-based order.
If international organizations stray from their founding objectives, they need to be revised, and democratic nations should consider the possibility of creating alternatives to organizations that have been manipulated or changed beyond recognition.
Mark Chen is a former minister of foreign affairs.
Translated by Paul Cooper
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the
RSS