US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has said that China tried to prevent US state governors from congratulating President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) on her electoral victory last month.
He reminded the governors that China is exploiting the US’ open society to infiltrate the country, and is extending the level of infiltration from local to federal government.
This is something that Taiwanese have long had to deal with, and now the US is coming to realize the threat presented by China’s sharp power.
China’s reach does not stop at single countries or a minority of nations; it is a global phenomenon.
Nowhere is this more explicitly manifested than its control of international organizations and its distortion of international regulations.
The purpose of the UN is to maintain peace and yet Beijing’s hegemonic ambitions have been laid bare since China’s rise.
Not only has it inserted considerable numbers of its own people into international organizations, it has also sought to interfere in their operations, and the original remit of many international organizations has been severely contorted.
Chinese have positions in virtually all UN agencies and their affiliate entities, not only as senior officials, but also increasingly mid-to-lower ranking public officials.
It is perfectly acceptable for public officials to maintain the interests of their own country, but when officials from different countries take up positions in international organizations they should not place their own country’s interests over that of the work of the international organization.
Unfortunately, when Chinese join international organizations they tend to use these positions to benefit their own national interests and try to promote China’s policies.
People have seen this in the way the UN denies participation in its forums by Republic of China (ROC) passport holders, or when Interpol issues a red notice that lists well-meaning Xinjiang exiles as terrorists or the UN Human Rights Council is forced to shelve human rights cases in countries with poor human rights records.
The COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan is another example. Taiwan’s healthcare standards are world-class and the crowdsourced global database Numbeo ranks Taiwan first in the world in terms of its health insurance metrics.
Yet the WHO has not only refused to allow Taiwan to join it, it also lumped Taiwan’s cases of people infected with the virus with those of China, while praising Beijing for its handling of the outbreak.
Even before this, the US, feeling that the UN system is becoming obsolete, has been systematically withdrawing from international organizations and treaties.
The US’ withdrawal will only help China extend its influence in international organizations, which would not be conducive to world peace.
The international order is being reshaped by events such as China’s rise and Brexit, and the US, instrumental in the creation of the post-World War II international order, needs to reflect deeply about the need for restructuring it, especially with the creation of core values of good governance within its Indo-Pacific strategy.
Rather than withdraw, the US should take the lead in forging a new democratic, rules-based order.
If international organizations stray from their founding objectives, they need to be revised, and democratic nations should consider the possibility of creating alternatives to organizations that have been manipulated or changed beyond recognition.
Mark Chen is a former minister of foreign affairs.
Translated by Paul Cooper
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS