The Bureau of Energy on Friday unveiled its preliminary feed-in tariff (FIT) rates for renewable energy sources, including solar, wind, biomass, biodegradable waste, geothermal and hydropower, which are to take effect next year. The rates are fixed prices paid to firms or individuals that generate electricity from renewable sources during a certain period, and the government has used the FIT scheme since 2010 along with other incentives to encourage green energy development in Taiwan.
The agency has proposed rates of between NT$3.9408 and NT$5.7788 per kilowatt-hour (kWh) for electricity from solar power systems, which is down by between 0.34 percent and 2.44 percent from this year’s levels and much less than the more than 10 percent reduction this year. In contrast, the FIT rates for wind power projects next year are to be 7 to 8 percent lower than this year, when levels decreased 5 percent. Rates for electricity generated from biomass, biodegradable waste and small hydro projects would be hiked by 1 to 4 percent to promote green energy diversification, according to the agency.
It is scheduled to hold hearings in Taipei, Taichung and Tainan beginning this week to gauge public opinion about the preliminary rates before a final proposal by the end of this month, but the solar photovoltaic (PV) and wind power industries have already given mixed responses.
According to reports by the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper), PV companies welcome the proposal, but wind power developers said they could not accept the planned rates, as the cost of wind turbines has not fallen sharply in the past two years. Wind power developers have called on the agency to recalculate the rates in a more realistic manner.
The rates are reviewed by the energy bureau annually, which allows it to consider market trends and potential changes in energy developers’ capital expenditures and the price of electricity. The agency usually holds talks with trade associations in advance and conducts public hearings to fine-tune its proposals, with the hope of setting rates that are within acceptable ranges. However, the calculation formula is complex and takes time to complete, as it factors in installation costs, capital recovery rates, annual maintenance and operation expenses, annual sale of electricity and purchase periods.
It is reasonable to see different opinions from energy segments on the rates, as Taiwan’s calculation formula has not yet matured compared with systems in the US, Germany, Japan and Australia. Therefore, establishing the appropriate rates remains a major challenge to the optimization and effective implementation of the FIT scheme.
Still, important lessons could be learned in the process of setting tariffs every year amid patient negotiations between the public and private sectors.
However, the scheme should involve more citizens and small businesses in the generation of renewable energy. In the past two years, Taiwan has seen so-called “citizen-run power plants,” which are run by four cooperatives. These operations often use rooftop solar systems with PV capacity below 100kW and occupying less than about 300 ping (991.7m2), and they are the kind of power plants that need more incentives from the government and better returns on investment aided by appropriate rates to attract more people to participate in renewable energy generation.
The current environment still does not appreciate citizen participation and there is still room for the FIT policy to improve.
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi lit a fuse the moment she declared that trouble for Taiwan means trouble for Japan. Beijing roared, Tokyo braced and like a plot twist nobody expected that early in the story, US President Donald Trump suddenly picked up the phone to talk to her. For a man who normally prefers to keep Asia guessing, the move itself was striking. What followed was even more intriguing. No one outside the room knows the exact phrasing, the tone or the diplomatic eyebrow raises exchanged, but the broad takeaway circulating among people familiar with the call was this: Trump did