At temples in Taiwan, visitors can find a donations box through which they can give as they please. Some temples make considerable amounts from this “incense money,” which raises questions over how they use the funds. For the nation’s universities, income from donations solicited as part of the endowment fund system is essentially their version of incense money and, similarly, there are questions over how this money is used.
Prior to 1999, budgets for national universities came entirely from the Ministry of Education, with a requirement that surplus income be returned to the state coffers at the end of the year. With the establishment of the university endowment fund, institutions were expected to manage donations and were allowed to solicit funds, giving them more financial flexibility.
Before the National University Endowment Fund Establishment Act (國立大學校院校務基金設置條例) was amended in 2015, endowment fund management committees were responsible for the money. The seven to 15 members of such committees were to form an auditing body to supervise the committee and to do post-auditing tasks. This arrangement worked well from 1999 to 2015.
However, the legislature, which was controlled at the time by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), introduced amendments removing the requirement for a committee and instead allowed university heads to allocate auditing personnel themselves. From that point on, endowment funds became the piggy banks of university presidents.
Sources of money include government budgets, tuition and miscellaneous fees, income from continuous education, academia-industry cooperation, facility management income and donations. The combined operating fees for next year for Taiwan’s 50 state-backed institutions is more than NT$100 billion (US$3.28 billion), of which NT$56.3 billion is to come from government subsidies, with the rest from self-solicited sources, including operating subsidies for government programs.
University presidents say that they face stress because they lack the funds to hire faculty or provide subsidies to students and assistants.
According to the ministry’s university open data platform, in 2017 the institute with the highest debt-to-asset ratio was National Chengchi University (NCCU) at 34.72 percent, which just happened to have former minister of education Wu Se-hwa (吳思華) as a previous university head and lecturer at the time. Wu as minister had advocated for the amendment abolishing the need for auditing committee oversight. NCCU was followed, in order, by National Tsing Hua University, National Taiwan Normal University and National Cheng Kung University.
Taiwan’s elite institutions are in arrears because most of the money is plowed into constructing new buildings or extending campus grounds. If a new financial oversight and management mechanism is not put in place, before long national universities might be facing a crisis of credit overextension.
New Power Party Legislator Cheng Hsiu-ling (鄭秀玲) has called for an amendment to the act to reinstate oversight and auditing of the committee’s endowment fund to prevent fraud, but the Association of National Universities of Taiwan is only willing to agree to university presidents nominating auditing personnel to be approved by a committee, which would rob them of genuine independence.
If national universities refuse to be transparent about their use of endowment funds, people should consider not donating to them, so they are no longer supporting a few individuals controlling university incense money.
Tai Po-fen is a professor in the sociology department at Fu Jen Catholic University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi lit a fuse the moment she declared that trouble for Taiwan means trouble for Japan. Beijing roared, Tokyo braced and like a plot twist nobody expected that early in the story, US President Donald Trump suddenly picked up the phone to talk to her. For a man who normally prefers to keep Asia guessing, the move itself was striking. What followed was even more intriguing. No one outside the room knows the exact phrasing, the tone or the diplomatic eyebrow raises exchanged, but the broad takeaway circulating among people familiar with the call was this: Trump did