At temples in Taiwan, visitors can find a donations box through which they can give as they please. Some temples make considerable amounts from this “incense money,” which raises questions over how they use the funds. For the nation’s universities, income from donations solicited as part of the endowment fund system is essentially their version of incense money and, similarly, there are questions over how this money is used.
Prior to 1999, budgets for national universities came entirely from the Ministry of Education, with a requirement that surplus income be returned to the state coffers at the end of the year. With the establishment of the university endowment fund, institutions were expected to manage donations and were allowed to solicit funds, giving them more financial flexibility.
Before the National University Endowment Fund Establishment Act (國立大學校院校務基金設置條例) was amended in 2015, endowment fund management committees were responsible for the money. The seven to 15 members of such committees were to form an auditing body to supervise the committee and to do post-auditing tasks. This arrangement worked well from 1999 to 2015.
However, the legislature, which was controlled at the time by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), introduced amendments removing the requirement for a committee and instead allowed university heads to allocate auditing personnel themselves. From that point on, endowment funds became the piggy banks of university presidents.
Sources of money include government budgets, tuition and miscellaneous fees, income from continuous education, academia-industry cooperation, facility management income and donations. The combined operating fees for next year for Taiwan’s 50 state-backed institutions is more than NT$100 billion (US$3.28 billion), of which NT$56.3 billion is to come from government subsidies, with the rest from self-solicited sources, including operating subsidies for government programs.
University presidents say that they face stress because they lack the funds to hire faculty or provide subsidies to students and assistants.
According to the ministry’s university open data platform, in 2017 the institute with the highest debt-to-asset ratio was National Chengchi University (NCCU) at 34.72 percent, which just happened to have former minister of education Wu Se-hwa (吳思華) as a previous university head and lecturer at the time. Wu as minister had advocated for the amendment abolishing the need for auditing committee oversight. NCCU was followed, in order, by National Tsing Hua University, National Taiwan Normal University and National Cheng Kung University.
Taiwan’s elite institutions are in arrears because most of the money is plowed into constructing new buildings or extending campus grounds. If a new financial oversight and management mechanism is not put in place, before long national universities might be facing a crisis of credit overextension.
New Power Party Legislator Cheng Hsiu-ling (鄭秀玲) has called for an amendment to the act to reinstate oversight and auditing of the committee’s endowment fund to prevent fraud, but the Association of National Universities of Taiwan is only willing to agree to university presidents nominating auditing personnel to be approved by a committee, which would rob them of genuine independence.
If national universities refuse to be transparent about their use of endowment funds, people should consider not donating to them, so they are no longer supporting a few individuals controlling university incense money.
Tai Po-fen is a professor in the sociology department at Fu Jen Catholic University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with