The various political parties’ lists of legislator-at-large nominees have drawn far more controversy this year than in previous elections. The one released by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has been particularly contentious, to the extent that the commotion surrounding it nearly cost KMT Chairman Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) his post.
The reasons for this were myriad. Here are but a few.
Former KMT legislator Chiu Yi (邱毅) has made a habit of stirring up controversy and drama, and his so-called “scoops” have not always proven entirely accurate, ruffling more than a few feathers. Those who dislike the man properly loathe him, while the few that care for him think he is the bee’s knees. One of his more recent greatest hits was proposing that China use military force to annex Taiwan.
However, on the matter of the list, Chiu seems to have had an uncharacteristic bout of self-awareness: He voluntarily withdrew his name from the list, throwing in his lot instead with the New Party, which placed him at the top of its own.
Retired lieutenant general Wu Sz-huai (吳斯懷) won notoriety after he was filmed at a major event in Beijing in 2016. Wu Sz-huai sat quietly and listened to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) speech, and when the participants stood to sing the Chinese national anthem, he, too, rose to his feet. It remains unclear whether he actually sang along.
On another occasion, he provided suggestions to the Chinese People’s Liberation Army on how to fight against the US in a TV program broadcast by Hong Kong-based Phoenix Satellite TV, suggesting his turncoat potential.
Wu Sz-huai has assured the Taiwanese public that he was merely following “international etiquette” when he stood for the Chinese national anthem. Surely, “international” suggests affairs between two or more nations. Since China does not recognize Taiwan as a nation, what does he mean by “international,” or was he essentially promoting Taiwanese independence?
It is possible that this initial list was all part of a cunning plan by Wu Den-yih. Not only did putting Wu Sz-huai fourth on the list please Beijing, it also served as an incentive for the retired lieutenant general to stay in Taiwan, lured by the offer of becoming a legislator.
Wu Sz-huai would probably soon wake to the many privileges of being a legislator, including exclusive vehicles, a multimillion New Taiwan dollar annual salary, personal assistants coming out of his ears, annual overseas inspection tours, immunity from persecution and being feared by government officials. What is not to love?
It is unlikely that he could look forward to such a cushy number if he went to China, where he might even find himself having to memorize the quotations of Mao Zedong (毛澤東) in a re-education camp.
Dismissing media coverage of his past and unfavorable public opinion, Wu Sz-huai immediately swore loyalty to “the Republic of China [ROC], which is different from that of President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文).”
Perhaps people will get used to him being a legislator over time.
The ROC is a slippery concept; Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) once said that it “was subjugated together with the mainland and ceased to exist.”
If Xi had his way, the ROC would go the way of the dodo altogether.
At least Tsai regards the ROC as being alive and well, albeit equating it with Taiwan. There is no consensus about whether the ROC exists or what it actually means.
For Wu Sz-huai, there exists an ROC distinct from Tsai’s. Where is it and what is it like? Does it even need to exist at all?
Peng Ming-min is a former Presidential Office adviser.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi lit a fuse the moment she declared that trouble for Taiwan means trouble for Japan. Beijing roared, Tokyo braced and like a plot twist nobody expected that early in the story, US President Donald Trump suddenly picked up the phone to talk to her. For a man who normally prefers to keep Asia guessing, the move itself was striking. What followed was even more intriguing. No one outside the room knows the exact phrasing, the tone or the diplomatic eyebrow raises exchanged, but the broad takeaway circulating among people familiar with the call was this: Trump did