According to the most recent tally, the Washington Post, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal publish a combined total of 1,000 stories every day. Although the report did not say how many people read all of them, it is safe to assume that nobody managed to do so.
Each of us probably overlooks tens of thousands of important news stories every year, but the biggest one that people missed this year happened on Oct.10 in a conference hall in Lyon, France, where a gathering of government officials, business leaders and philanthropists pledged US$14 billion to an organization called the Global Fund.
Not many people know what the Global Fund is until they hear its full name: the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.
Illustration: Mountain People
The fund was established shortly after the turn of the millennium, when hundreds of thousands of children were dying from preventable diseases. The AIDS crisis was at its height, with news outlets describing the virus as a “malevolent scythe” cutting across sub-Saharan Africa. Its unstoppable spread, some predicted, would lead to the collapse of entire countries.
This was an international crisis that required an international response.
Then-UN secretary-general Kofi Annan rallied the world around the Millennium Development Goals — a set of specific targets related to poverty and disease reduction — and launched the Global Fund to achieve them.
The fund was designed to be a new kind of multilateral venture, not just a coalition of governments. It also brought in partners from the business and philanthropic sectors, including the newly formed Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
This inclusive approach enabled the initiative to draw on a wider range of expertise.
Over the past two decades, the Global Fund has transformed the way people fight AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria — the three biggest killers in poor countries.
By pooling resources, the fund created economies of scale for life-saving products such as anti-malarial bed nets and antiretroviral drugs. Then, by working with almost 100 countries, the fund built a massive supply chain to deliver the goods.
In the process, deaths from AIDS have fallen by 50 percent from their peak and malaria deaths have decreased by about 50 percent since the turn of the millennium.
Now, the fund has US$14 billion in new funding to continue this work.
The replenishment is vitally important news, first and foremost because of the sheer number of lives it will help to save. The US$14 billion, the fund says, is expected be enough to cut the three diseases’ death rates by almost 50 percent again by 2023.
That translates into 16 million lives saved.
However, what happened on Oct. 10 in Lyon is critical for another reason: It illustrates how the world is at a pivotal point in history, from which it might move in one direction or another.
On one hand, the successful recent fundraising effort was a testament to the way the world went about solving humanitarian crises in the early years of this century. Multilateralism, it turns out, worked — and worked extremely well.
That same period also gave rise to organizations such as Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance — a global alliance of public and private-sector stakeholders that aims to get vaccines to some of the world’s poorest children.
Gavi has helped to immunize more than 760 million children to date, and the coverage rate of the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine in Gavi-supported countries increased from 59 percent in 2000 to 81 percent last year — only four percentage points below the global average.
Gavi, too, needs to raise new funding over the next year.
On the other hand, the fact that no similar multilateral organization has been established since the early 2000s — at least not on such a scale — should give everyone pause.
The fund managed to raise the US$14 billion at a time of rising isolationism. Today, many governments seem to prefer to go it alone rather than engage in the expansive problem-solving that worked so well over the past 20 years.
Brexit is one example of this. Others include US President Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw the US from the Paris Agreement on climate change, and his administration’s call for deep cuts to US foreign aid — which, thanks to the US Congress, have yet to be made.
What would have happened had the AIDS crisis emerged 20 years later than it did? Would people be able to create the Global Fund today?
The answer, I think, is no. It would be very difficult to build support for that kind of initiative in this environment.
Last month’s news from Lyon, then, is part of an ongoing story. Will the world realize that multilateral coalitions work and reverse course? Or is the era of multilateralism at an end?
The Global Fund’s replenishment might be the best news you had not yet heard about this year, but unless everyone halts the slide toward isolationism and starts rebuilding a global community, it is the kind of news you might never hear again.
Mark Suzman is chief strategy officer and president of global policy and advocacy at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this