Europe’s political forces are divided between those who regard the EU as promoting unfair, inefficient neoliberal economic policies, and those who see the bloc as key to preserving the relatively equitable and inclusive “European social model.”
Yet the recent European Parliament election featured little debate about this model and generated few ideas for what policymakers should do to tackle income inequality across the continent.
That is a pity. Comparisons of income growth and inequality in Europe and the US over the past four decades have yielded important new insights into why incomes are far more evenly distributed in Europe than in the US, and about what each side of the Atlantic could learn from the other.
Illustration: Mountain People
Overall, US incomes have grown faster than those in Europe over the past 40 years. Between 1980 and 2017, average national income per adult grew 65 percent in the US, compared with 51 percent in Europe. The difference largely, though not entirely, reflects the EU’s failure to coordinate a continent-wide economic stimulus following the 2007-2008 financial crisis.
Compared with Western Europe, which subsequently suffered a lost decade (2007-2017) in which average national income per adult grew by less than 5 percent, the US grew five times faster.
However, these average growth rates conceal the extent to which income inequality has exploded in the US over the past four decades, while remaining far less extreme in Europe.
Although the average pre-tax income of the top 50 percent of US earners has more than doubled since 1980, that of the bottom half has grown by just 3 percent.
In Europe, on the other hand, the pre-tax income of the bottom half of the population grew by 40 percent over the same period — more than 10 times faster than for their US counterparts — although still below overall average European income growth.
Differences between US and European tax and transfer systems do not significantly change the overall picture. After taking these into account, the post-tax incomes of the bottom 50 percent have grown by a modest 14 percent in the US since 1980 — still way below overall income growth — and by up to 40 percent in Europe.
Economists often attribute rising inequality to technological change or growth in international trade. Yet this does not explain the sharply divergent inequality trends over the past 40 years in the US and Europe, because both experienced similar technological shocks and faced increased competition from developing countries over that period.
Instead, the contrast between Europe and the US reflects different policy choices.
Policymakers have two broad options for tackling income inequality:
Predistribution aims to create the conditions for a more even distribution of income in the future — through investments in healthcare and education, effective antitrust laws and labor-market regulations, and relatively strong labor unions, for example.
Redistribution of income, meanwhile, aims to reduce current inequalities through progressive taxation — whereby richer people pay higher rates of tax — and social transfers to the poorest.
Europe’s lower levels of inequality are not a consequence of more redistributive tax policies. True, the top marginal rate of US federal income tax has fallen from an average of 80 percent in 1950-1980 to 37 percent today, and US President Donald Trump lowered the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent in his Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.
However, Europe’s corporate tax rates have also plunged, from an average of 50 percent in 1980 to 25 percent today — thereby benefiting richer citizens who increasingly rely on personal shareholdings for their income.
Moreover, taxes on consumption, which impose a proportionately greater burden on the poor, increased significantly in Europe over the same period.
Taxation systems in both the US and Europe, therefore, have generally become less progressive in recent decades. If anything, the US’ tax system is now slightly more progressive than Europe’s, but US inequality is nonetheless far greater.
The World Inequality Lab’s How Unequal Is Europe? report suggests that Europe’s more equal income distribution is largely the result of predistributive policies such as national minimum wages, greater worker protections, and free access to public education and healthcare.
Yet progressive taxation is still key to reducing both post and pre-tax income inequality. High marginal tax rates, for example, can help to limit unequal capital accumulation today and therefore make future income flows more equitable.
More fundamentally, progressive taxes are essential for the political sustainability of countries’ fiscal systems. The “yellow vest” protests that began in France in November last year — and appeared elsewhere in Europe thereafter — were initially ignited by a feeling of tax injustice.
Finally, progressive taxation also plays a predistributive role in Europe by helping to finance universal public education and healthcare programs. These in turn promote greater equality of opportunity and thus more equal distribution of income later on. The danger, therefore, is that the general trend toward less progressive tax systems would make it harder for Europe and the US to contain inequality in the future.
However, this is not inevitable. Perhaps US voters might become keener on free public education and healthcare if they see how these have supported rather than hampered economic growth in Europe. And Europe might draw inspiration from how the US government largely ended tax competition between states a century ago by introducing federal corporate and income taxes.
If Europe and the US can learn from each other in this way, radical-sounding approaches to tackling inequality might start to look more pragmatic and feasible on both sides of the Atlantic. And the next four decades might be less unequal than the previous four.
Thomas Blanchet is statistical tools and methods coordinator at the World Inequality Lab at the Paris School of Economics. Lucas Chancel, codirector of the lab, is a lecturer at Sciences Po and a research fellow at the Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations. Amory Gethin is a research fellow at the lab.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations