Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Tuesday held a military parade to mark the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China.
Redolent of Cold War-era mass parades, a tightly choreographed procession of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s latest hardware — including tanks, intercontinental ballistic missiles and deep-sea drones — rumbled through Beijing’s Tiananmen Square, followed by rank after rank of goose-stepping soldiers in immaculately pressed uniforms and a float with a gigantic portrait of China’s dear leader.
The man himself, accompanied by generals, surveyed the proceedings standing half in, half out of a fleet of jet-black vehicles with holes cut out of their roofs, onto which were bolted quadruplets of microphones. Xi’s matte black Mao suit and coiffed jet-black hair, perfectly coordinated with the color of his automobile, had the effect — perhaps deliberate — of creating a remarkably sinister, if faintly comic, image: he could be the next Bond villain.
Xi delivered a speech to mark the occasion, which was clearly aimed at a domestic audience. He made a number of contradictory statements, which, to an outside observer, perfectly encapsulated the tone-deaf nature of his leadership, in particular his policies toward Taiwan and Hong Kong.
Xi started out by praising the “epic progress” China has made during the past seven decades under the Chinese Communist Party, neatly sidestepping the appalling human calamity brought about by the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution — the policies of Mao Zedong (毛澤東), responsible for killing even more people than Joseph Stalin’s gulags.
Xi then extended “sincere greetings” to “fellow Chinese” in Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan, promising that China would “continue to fully and faithfully implement the principles of ‘one country, two systems,’ ‘Hong Kong people administering Hong Kong,’ ‘Macau people administering Macau’ and a high degree of autonomy.”
You would have to had been living under a rock for the past few months not to notice that promises made by Xi and his party are not worth the paper they are written on. As Hong Kongers are all too aware, Beijing has been doggedly working away behind the scenes to erode Hong Kong’s autonomy ever since the territory’s handover from Britain in 1997. His officials have even explicitly stated that the Sino-British Joint Declaration is a “historic document” and therefore void.
Turning directly to Taiwanese matters, Xi went on to pledge that China would uphold the “one China” principle and the so-called “1992 consensus,” and promote the peaceful development of relations across the Taiwan Strait. Do these “peaceful developments” include China’s military regularly conducting encirclement drills in the skies and seas near Taiwan? Or perhaps Xi was referring to his regime’s militarization of the South China Sea, designed to prevent the US from coming to Taiwan’s aid in the event that China carries out an invasion.
Next, Xi dialed up the rhetoric, saying: “The complete reunification of the motherland is an inevitable trend; it is what the greater national interests entail and what all Chinese people aspire for. No one and no force can ever stop it.”
This overt threat to annex Taiwan was directly followed with a classic example of Orwellian doublespeak: “We will hold high the banner of peace, development, cooperation and mutual benefit, and keep firmly to the path of peaceful development.”
Finally, Xi promised to create an “unparalleled force that will power the ship of our national renewal to clip waves and reach its destination.”
It seems that under Xi, China’s “final destination” is no less than total world domination and the usurpation of the post-World War II Pax Americana.
The parade and Xi’s speech are a useful reminder to the world that Beijing is not going to change course any time soon. The Berlin Wall might have fallen three decades ago, but fascism still lives on in China.
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is