Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Tuesday held a military parade to mark the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China.
Redolent of Cold War-era mass parades, a tightly choreographed procession of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s latest hardware — including tanks, intercontinental ballistic missiles and deep-sea drones — rumbled through Beijing’s Tiananmen Square, followed by rank after rank of goose-stepping soldiers in immaculately pressed uniforms and a float with a gigantic portrait of China’s dear leader.
The man himself, accompanied by generals, surveyed the proceedings standing half in, half out of a fleet of jet-black vehicles with holes cut out of their roofs, onto which were bolted quadruplets of microphones. Xi’s matte black Mao suit and coiffed jet-black hair, perfectly coordinated with the color of his automobile, had the effect — perhaps deliberate — of creating a remarkably sinister, if faintly comic, image: he could be the next Bond villain.
Xi delivered a speech to mark the occasion, which was clearly aimed at a domestic audience. He made a number of contradictory statements, which, to an outside observer, perfectly encapsulated the tone-deaf nature of his leadership, in particular his policies toward Taiwan and Hong Kong.
Xi started out by praising the “epic progress” China has made during the past seven decades under the Chinese Communist Party, neatly sidestepping the appalling human calamity brought about by the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution — the policies of Mao Zedong (毛澤東), responsible for killing even more people than Joseph Stalin’s gulags.
Xi then extended “sincere greetings” to “fellow Chinese” in Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan, promising that China would “continue to fully and faithfully implement the principles of ‘one country, two systems,’ ‘Hong Kong people administering Hong Kong,’ ‘Macau people administering Macau’ and a high degree of autonomy.”
You would have to had been living under a rock for the past few months not to notice that promises made by Xi and his party are not worth the paper they are written on. As Hong Kongers are all too aware, Beijing has been doggedly working away behind the scenes to erode Hong Kong’s autonomy ever since the territory’s handover from Britain in 1997. His officials have even explicitly stated that the Sino-British Joint Declaration is a “historic document” and therefore void.
Turning directly to Taiwanese matters, Xi went on to pledge that China would uphold the “one China” principle and the so-called “1992 consensus,” and promote the peaceful development of relations across the Taiwan Strait. Do these “peaceful developments” include China’s military regularly conducting encirclement drills in the skies and seas near Taiwan? Or perhaps Xi was referring to his regime’s militarization of the South China Sea, designed to prevent the US from coming to Taiwan’s aid in the event that China carries out an invasion.
Next, Xi dialed up the rhetoric, saying: “The complete reunification of the motherland is an inevitable trend; it is what the greater national interests entail and what all Chinese people aspire for. No one and no force can ever stop it.”
This overt threat to annex Taiwan was directly followed with a classic example of Orwellian doublespeak: “We will hold high the banner of peace, development, cooperation and mutual benefit, and keep firmly to the path of peaceful development.”
Finally, Xi promised to create an “unparalleled force that will power the ship of our national renewal to clip waves and reach its destination.”
It seems that under Xi, China’s “final destination” is no less than total world domination and the usurpation of the post-World War II Pax Americana.
The parade and Xi’s speech are a useful reminder to the world that Beijing is not going to change course any time soon. The Berlin Wall might have fallen three decades ago, but fascism still lives on in China.
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8). In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls. The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired,
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
RSS