You have just arrived at the hotel after a delayed flight and a half-hour wrangle with the car-hire firm — and then you remember that you have forgotten to pay last month’s credit card bill, and there will be an interest charge if you wait until you are back at base.
But —- hey —- you can do it online and help is at hand. The receptionist is welcoming and helpful. They have Wi-Fi and it is free.
Relieved, you ask for the password. “Oh, you don’t need one,” he replies. “Just type in your room number and click the box.”
Phew! Problem solved. Er, not necessarily.
At this point the human race divides into two groups. Call them sheep and goats.
Sheep are sweet, trusting folks who like to think well of their fellow humans. Surely that helpful receptionist would not knowingly offer a dangerous service.
Also, they find digital technology baffling and intimidating. And they cannot imagine why anything they do online might be of interest to anyone.
Goats, on the other hand, have nasty, suspicious minds. They believe that many of their fellow humans may be up to something. They believe that, in this networked world, only the paranoid survive.
So when they see an open, free Wi-Fi network they smell a rat. And they would never, ever send confidential information via such a channel.
Sadly, in this particular context, the goats are wiser than the sheep.
They know that hotel chains have become a coveted target of hackers.
Many of the industry’s biggest operators have reported data breaches in recent years, including big names such as Hilton, InterContinental, Marriott and Hyatt.
Most of these attacks, according to Bloomberg, are focused on the property management systems (PMS) used by hotel chains to take reservations, issue room keys and store credit card data.
The Bloomberg report, written by Patrick Clark, was based on the exploits of a team of “white hat” hackers, employed to test the security of a particular system.
After plugging the Internet cable from a bedroom’s smart TV into a laptop they got into the hotel’s PMS, which led to the chain owner’s corporate system.
In doing so they gained access to credit card information for several years’ worth of transactions in dozens of hotels — and if they had been crooks the team could have sold the information on the black market, where a Visa card with a high credit limit can fetch up to US$20.
Why are hotels such tempting targets? Partly because their systems are easy to penetrate, technically.
“Hospitality companies long saw technology as antithetical to the human touch that represented good service. The industry’s admirable habit of promoting from the bottom up means it’s not uncommon to find IT executives who started their careers toting luggage. Former bellboys might understand how a hotel works better than a software engineer, but that doesn’t mean they understand network architecture,” Clark wrote.
The vulnerability is also a reflection of an occupational culture. After all, the hotel business is about welcoming guests and trying to anticipate — and satisfy — their needs.
Nowadays, everybody expects to have free Wi-Fi, so why not give them that in the most hassle-free way imaginable? No messing with passwords and cumbersome log-in procedures; just type in the room number and click “OK.”
From a hacker’s perspective, therefore, the hospitality industry looks like a prime opportunity: easy pickings from hotels’ booking records, plus juicy items of personal information from sheep using insecure Wi-Fi networks.
And it is not just hackers who are attracted to these honeypots, by the way.
The director of any intelligence service that has not been inside the internal systems of Trump’s Washington hotel since his election, for example, ought to be summarily fired for incompetence.
In the meantime, what can traveling holidaymakers do to protect themselves? The short answer is to invest in — and install — virtual private network (VPN) software on any device that travels with you.
A VPN functions as an encrypted tunnel to a special server located somewhere on the Internet.
If you connect to the Observer through a VPN, for example, then the VPN server connects to the paper on your behalf, and because all the traffic is encrypted it is gobbledegook to any snooper, which means that you can safely use hotel (and cafe) Wi-Fi networks wherever you go.
The only downside is that such unlimited protection does not come free, alas, so expect to pay an annual fee. (There are some free services, but they have restrictions on data usage or the number of devices or services you can access.)
TechRadar provides a useful guide to the best VPNs.
Remember that only the paranoid survive. And enjoy the rest of your holiday.
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8). In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls. The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired,
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
RSS