Tuesday marked the 40th anniversary of official US-China diplomatic relations. On Thursday last week, US President Donald Trump wrote on Twitter: “Just had a long and very good call with President Xi [Jinping (習近平)] of China. Deal is moving along very well. If made, it will be very comprehensive, covering all subjects, areas and points of dispute. Big progress being made.”
Trump is very experienced in dealing with rogue states. He talks a lot and no one knows if what he says is true.
However, official Chinese media have an even higher opinion about this latest telephone call.
Xinhua news agency said on its Chinese-language Web site that the “conversation reflected the US’ and China’s shared wish for coordination and cooperation, and the two countries are searching for ways to set the development of bilateral relations on a road toward overall stability... Reaching these agreements were not easy, and they are very important.”
The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs also posted a statement on its Web site by spokesman Lu Kang (陸慷) strongly affirming the past 40 years of US-China relations.
However, US mainstream society and media have expressed no interest in the anniversary, and Trump did not even mention it in his tweets, although US broadcaster Voice of America said that the US Army on many occasions has said that it would cooperate with China if it can and oppose it if it must.
The US has lost all trust in China, and even if China were to fall on its knees and ask the US to end the trade war to avoid a collapse, the US is still demanding that China conduct structural political and economic reform.
At a big event celebrating 40 years of reform and the opening up of China’s market, Xi said that some things would not be reformed, and to this he day he has refused to admit to Chinese intellectual property theft and cyberattacks.
In the end, the US and China might go to war to bring about a fundamental solution to their troubles.
Last month, Trump played some military tricks. First he decided to pull US troops out of Syria and said that he would reduce the US’ military presence in Afghanistan. He has now decided to slow down the pullout from Syria.
Second, he paid a sudden visit to US troops in Iraq to prevent any rash moves from Iran or the Islamic State group and to avoid an attack following a troop withdrawal.
This news makes it clear that the US does not want a war on two fronts and is focusing on China while improving ties with Russia to prevent it from becoming involved in a war between the US and China.
It is unlikely that Russia would want to become involved in such a war, as it is more interested in Xinjiang. If there is war between the US and China, the 1 million people in concentration camps in Xinjiang are certain to revolt and Russian troops would go to their rescue.
This is why US troops should not be pulled out of Afghanistan. They are needed to assist with the liberation of Xinjiang, to stir up the Tibetans and to restrict Russia. If China comes under attack from both sides, it would be on the verge of collapse, and that is when true reform would be seen.
Time is not on the US’ side. This is something that former US secretary of defense James Mattis did not understand, and that was why Trump had to force him out.
Trump does not want to station troops overseas, but a war with China would be a quick local sea and air war.
As long as the Zhanjiang, Sanya, Ningbo and Qingdao naval bases are destroyed, as well as the Jiangnan Shipyard in Shanghai and Dalian Shipbuilding Industry Co in Dalian, the Chinese navy would sustain a heavy blow and it would be a long time before it got back on its feet.
This would be a fundamental solution to China’s expansionism and aggression, and it would also create the conditions to change the pirate nation.
Trump’s Republican predecessor, former US president George W. Bush, started the invasion of Iraq and the war in Afghanistan, meaning that it is not impossible for Trump to follow in Bush’s footsteps and start another war.
Winning that war and removing an enemy of democratic nations and a danger to humanity would make the US even mightier and guarantee Trump’s re-election while President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) — with whom the US is very comfortable — is in power in Taiwan and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is forced to choose sides. This is the way to solve the dispute over Taiwanese sovereignty.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
RSS