Data released by the Chinese National Bureau of Statistics on Friday showed that China’s GDP growth slowed to 6.5 percent in the third quarter, the lowest since early 2009. China’s growth faces increasing pressure from the US-China trade war, Beijing’s financial deleveraging and property curbs, the US Federal Reserve’s interest rate hikes and a weakening yuan that is prompting capital outflows.
The People’s Bank of China has lowered its reserve requirement ratio four times to encourage lending and has urged banks to increase lending to cash-starved small companies, but Chinese media have reported that banks’ loan requirements for small firms and private companies remain stringent, and further reserve requirement reduction is expected.
Chinese equities have fared worse than other Asian markets this year, with yuan-denominated A-shares in Shanghai last week falling to a four-year low. Worries about the forced sale of pledged shares spiked last week after firms said that their major investors had failed to meet demands for additional collateral.
As more forced sales would tip the markets into a downward spiral, Chinese regulators have called on creditors to prevent them, while a number of state-run funds and local government-backed enterprises have injected funds into listed firms facing forced liquidation of pledged shares.
Government intervention in the stock market is a sign of commitment to maintaining market stability, restoring investor confidence and pumping more liquidity into the market, yet the latest tallies compiled by China International Capital Corp show that by last month, 26 companies listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen had sold controlling stakes to central, provincial or city governments, as they could only access capital through the state. This has triggered discussions about public versus private ownership of businesses and speculation that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) might sideline the private sector and advance the state sector.
The speculation dates to January, when Zhou Xincheng (周新城), a professor at Renmin University of China’s School of Marxism Studies, advocated developing the public sector in CCP political theory journal Qiushi (求是), calling for the elimination of private property.
His words caused a massive splash on Chinese social media, but Beijing authorities at the time kept to the sidelines.
Eight months later, Wu Xiaoping (吳小平) in an article on the Jinri Toutiao (今日頭條) Web site said that the private sector had fulfilled its task and should gradually wither to make way for a fully fledged state-run economy.
This time, facing a wave of public criticism, ranking Chinese officials and state media said that the two sectors are interdependent and the private economy would only grow bigger.
Apparently, Beijing is trying to assure the public that it supports the private sector — which makes up more than 60 percent of China’s GDP — and does not want any reactionary ideas to question its reformist agenda and policy of opening up the economy at a time when it is already facing headwinds.
However, it remains to be seen whether expanding the state’s influence on the private sector and squeezing out private firms are mere debate topics or a policy agenda in the making. After all, China’s idiosyncratic economic environment often defies conventional thought about capitalist markets.
Policy risk is one more potential headwind facing the Chinese economy, and foreign businesses, including Taiwanese firms, that are planning to invest or expand operations in China should take note.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
RSS