The Ministry of Culture’s budget for establishing a Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese) TV channel has been passed by the Cabinet. If everything goes smoothly, a Public Television Service Hoklo channel will start airing next year.
The government established Hakka TV and Taiwan Indigenous TV during former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) administration.
After President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) assumed office, the nationwide Hakka Radio was established.
Regrettably, there is neither an official TV channel nor a radio station for Hoklo, a language used by more than 70 percent of the nation’s population.
During Chen’s presidency, the government allocated NT$3.45 billion (US$112.3 million at the current exchange rate) to establish the Taiwan Broadcasting System Hoklo TV station and Southern Operation Center at the Kaohsiung Multi-functional Commerce & Trade Park.
However, when former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) took office, he asked then-Government Information Office minister Vanessa Shih (史亞平) to re-evaluate the plan, which, plainly speaking, meant “cancel the project.”
This was quite expected by Hoklo language advocates.
Last year, civic groups promoting the establishment of a Hoklo TV station established the Alliance for the Promotion of a Public Hoklo Television Station.
Thanks to the alliance’s efforts over the past year, together with the ministry’s national language development division, which was established in 2016 to plan a national languages development act, there is finally a possibility that a Hoklo channel will be established next year.
However, is there reason to be optimistic that it will actually happen?
Hoklo is the only language lacking legal protection, while Hakka and Aboriginal languages are protected by the Hakka Basic Act (客家基本法) and the Aboriginal Language Development Act (原住民族語言發展法).
Furthermore, Hoklo is the nation’s only native language not listed as a national language and there is no agency dedicated to the protection of Hoklo.
The reason that the budget for a Hoklo channel was passed is that Premier William Lai (賴清德) coordinated a meeting on Thursday last week.
The ministry included a special budget of NT$400 million to subsidize the Public Television Service’s establishment of a Hoklo channel in the annual budget for next year.
This could once again be blocked if the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) wins a legislative majority in 2020. The question, therefore, is how to go about establishing a permanent Hoklo TV channel.
The answer is quite simple: The legislature should act swiftly to pass the national languages development act.
The draft act almost passed its third reading on May 18, but was blocked by the KMT and sent to cross-party negotiations. It then failed to pass the third reading in the extraordinary legislative session that started on June 11, making the establishment of the Hoklo channel uncertain.
If there is no law mandating a Hoklo channel, and such a channel must rely on a special budget that is allocated yearly, receiving the subsidy one year is no guarantee that it will receive it the following year. That is very worrying.
Hopefully, the government and the opposition will be able to put aside political differences and allow the legislature to pass the national languages development act in the next session to facilitate the stability and prosperity of a Hoklo channel.
Koeh Ian-lim is deputy director of the Union of Taiwan Teachers.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval