Last week, South Africa hosted the 10th annual gathering of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa).
When the first BRIC summit was held in 2009 (South Africa was added in 2010), the world was in the throes of a financial crisis of the developed world’s making and the increasingly dynamic BRIC bloc represented the future.
By coming together, these nations had the potential to provide a geopolitical counterweight to the West, but Western commentators have long underestimated that potential, forcing the BRICS to demand greater representation in global-governance institutions.
In 2011 and 2012, the BRICS challenged the process of selecting leaders at the IMF and World Bank, but lacking a united front behind them, a European (Christine Lagarde) and an American (Jim Yong Kim) continued to preside over those organizations.
Although the BRICS did get these institutions to reform their voting structures to give developing nations greater weight, the US and Europe still wield disproportionate power.
Against this backdrop, the BRICS took it upon themselves to pursue “outside options,” by establishing the New Development Bank (NDB) and the Contingent Reserve Arrangement in 2014.
These initiatives have been presented as complements to the prevailing Bretton Woods system, but it is easy to see how they could also form the foundation for an alternative global-governance framework at some point in the future.
After all, while the BRICS still emphasize the importance of multilateralism, it is clear that they are not wedded to the current international order.
Yes, permanent membership of the UN Security Council gives China and Russia distinct advantages over most other nations, but both are nevertheless skeptical of the existing order.
China’s foreign policy has increasingly come to reflect its status as a rising superpower.
In accordance with Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) “Chinese Dream,” China has been pushing hard for a relationship of equals vis-a-vis the US and at the 19th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party last year, Xi made his goal of restoring China’s great-power status even more explicit.
How China uses the many geopolitical instruments at its disposal will matter a great deal to the other BRICS nations, because they will have to adapt their national strategies to China’s own “outside options.”
Since 2013, China has established the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), launched its Belt and Road Initiative and proposed expanding the BRICS into a “BRICS Plus” — with China presumably at its head.
China announced its plans for the AIIB shortly after signing the NDB articles of agreement in 2014.
In the case of the NDB, each of the BRICS owns an equal share and each contributed US$10 billion to the initial subscribed capital.
Although equitable shareholding was not China’s preferred route, it did not force the matter.
By contrast, China is the AIIB’s largest shareholder by a wide margin, holding a 26.6 percent stake, compared with India’s 7.7 percent and Russia’s 6 percent, while Brazil and South Africa have made no capital contributions to date, despite being designated as “founding members.”
The AIIB thus exemplifies China — not the BRICS — exercising its own “outside option.”
The institution is open to developing and developed nations alike, and China is at its center.
Similarly, since its launch in 2013, the Belt and Road Initiative has evolved into what Cobus van Staden of the South African Institute of International Affairs calls a decidedly “Beijing-centric global trade and investment order.”
It is Xi’s signature project. His hope is to create a “community of shared destiny,” not only across Eurasia and the Indian Ocean.
The initiative allows China to translate its economic might into geopolitical power.
Lastly, the proposal for a “BRICS Plus” signals a shift in China’s external relations — one that will obviously affect the other BRICS.
At last year’s BRICS summit in Xiamen, China, Xi indicated that he wants the group to represent something larger than its current members, given the premium that it already places on cooperation among developing nations.
Xi’s initial proposal seemed to imply an expansion of the group, which some of the other BRICS have staunchly resisted. Still, South Africa took the idea forward by holding a “BRICS Plus” meeting on the third day of this year’s summit.
These three developments underscore the extent to which an emboldened China now wields outsize power relative to its BRICS partners.
Through the AIIB and the Belt and Road Initiative, China is laying the foundation for a new regional and global order.
The Chinese government is actively executing Xi’s vision through trade, investment and the strategic projection of power, particularly in the South China Sea.
Nevertheless, the other BRICS have an important role to play in legitimating China’s “other options.”
Each is committed to reforming the international system and to building a more multipolar world; but they have not necessarily reached a consensus about what a new order should look like.
Under South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, the nation is once again asserting leadership on the African continent.
This could entail a greater focus on Africa within the BRICS, but as South Africa pursues the continent’s interests in addition to its own, it will have to remain open to working not just with the BRICS, but also with other developing nations and coalitions.
The ultimate goal must be to support and reinforce a rules-based order. After all, that is in Africa’s interests.
Elizabeth Sidiropoulos is chief executive of the South African Institute of International Affairs.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Taiwan has lost Trump. Or so a former State Department official and lobbyist would have us believe. Writing for online outlet Domino Theory in an article titled “How Taiwan lost Trump,” Christian Whiton provides a litany of reasons that the William Lai (賴清德) and Donald Trump administrations have supposedly fallen out — and it’s all Lai’s fault. Although many of Whiton’s claims are misleading or ill-informed, the article is helpfully, if unintentionally, revealing of a key aspect of the MAGA worldview. Whiton complains of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party’s “inability to understand and relate to the New Right in America.” Many
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) earlier this month raised its travel alert for China’s Guangdong Province to Level 2 “Alert,” advising travelers to take enhanced precautions amid a chikungunya outbreak in the region. More than 8,000 cases have been reported in the province since June. Chikungunya is caused by the chikungunya virus and transmitted to humans through bites from infected mosquitoes, most commonly Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. These species thrive in warm, humid climates and are also major vectors for dengue, Zika and yellow fever. The disease is characterized by high fever and severe, often incapacitating joint pain.
In nature, there is a group of insects known as parasitoid wasps. Their reproductive process differs entirely from that of ordinary wasps — the female lays her eggs inside or on the bodies of other insects, and, once hatched, the larvae feed on the host’s body. The larvae do not kill the host insect immediately; instead, they carefully avoid vital organs, allowing the host to stay alive until the larvae are fully mature. That living reservoir strategy ensures a stable and fresh source of nutrients for the larvae as they grow. However, the host’s death becomes only a matter of time. The resemblance
Most countries are commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II with condemnations of militarism and imperialism, and commemoration of the global catastrophe wrought by the war. On the other hand, China is to hold a military parade. According to China’s state-run Xinhua news agency, Beijing is conducting the military parade in Tiananmen Square on Sept. 3 to “mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression.” However, during World War II, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) had not yet been established. It
RSS