Last week, South Africa hosted the 10th annual gathering of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa).
When the first BRIC summit was held in 2009 (South Africa was added in 2010), the world was in the throes of a financial crisis of the developed world’s making and the increasingly dynamic BRIC bloc represented the future.
By coming together, these nations had the potential to provide a geopolitical counterweight to the West, but Western commentators have long underestimated that potential, forcing the BRICS to demand greater representation in global-governance institutions.
In 2011 and 2012, the BRICS challenged the process of selecting leaders at the IMF and World Bank, but lacking a united front behind them, a European (Christine Lagarde) and an American (Jim Yong Kim) continued to preside over those organizations.
Although the BRICS did get these institutions to reform their voting structures to give developing nations greater weight, the US and Europe still wield disproportionate power.
Against this backdrop, the BRICS took it upon themselves to pursue “outside options,” by establishing the New Development Bank (NDB) and the Contingent Reserve Arrangement in 2014.
These initiatives have been presented as complements to the prevailing Bretton Woods system, but it is easy to see how they could also form the foundation for an alternative global-governance framework at some point in the future.
After all, while the BRICS still emphasize the importance of multilateralism, it is clear that they are not wedded to the current international order.
Yes, permanent membership of the UN Security Council gives China and Russia distinct advantages over most other nations, but both are nevertheless skeptical of the existing order.
China’s foreign policy has increasingly come to reflect its status as a rising superpower.
In accordance with Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) “Chinese Dream,” China has been pushing hard for a relationship of equals vis-a-vis the US and at the 19th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party last year, Xi made his goal of restoring China’s great-power status even more explicit.
How China uses the many geopolitical instruments at its disposal will matter a great deal to the other BRICS nations, because they will have to adapt their national strategies to China’s own “outside options.”
Since 2013, China has established the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), launched its Belt and Road Initiative and proposed expanding the BRICS into a “BRICS Plus” — with China presumably at its head.
China announced its plans for the AIIB shortly after signing the NDB articles of agreement in 2014.
In the case of the NDB, each of the BRICS owns an equal share and each contributed US$10 billion to the initial subscribed capital.
Although equitable shareholding was not China’s preferred route, it did not force the matter.
By contrast, China is the AIIB’s largest shareholder by a wide margin, holding a 26.6 percent stake, compared with India’s 7.7 percent and Russia’s 6 percent, while Brazil and South Africa have made no capital contributions to date, despite being designated as “founding members.”
The AIIB thus exemplifies China — not the BRICS — exercising its own “outside option.”
The institution is open to developing and developed nations alike, and China is at its center.
Similarly, since its launch in 2013, the Belt and Road Initiative has evolved into what Cobus van Staden of the South African Institute of International Affairs calls a decidedly “Beijing-centric global trade and investment order.”
It is Xi’s signature project. His hope is to create a “community of shared destiny,” not only across Eurasia and the Indian Ocean.
The initiative allows China to translate its economic might into geopolitical power.
Lastly, the proposal for a “BRICS Plus” signals a shift in China’s external relations — one that will obviously affect the other BRICS.
At last year’s BRICS summit in Xiamen, China, Xi indicated that he wants the group to represent something larger than its current members, given the premium that it already places on cooperation among developing nations.
Xi’s initial proposal seemed to imply an expansion of the group, which some of the other BRICS have staunchly resisted. Still, South Africa took the idea forward by holding a “BRICS Plus” meeting on the third day of this year’s summit.
These three developments underscore the extent to which an emboldened China now wields outsize power relative to its BRICS partners.
Through the AIIB and the Belt and Road Initiative, China is laying the foundation for a new regional and global order.
The Chinese government is actively executing Xi’s vision through trade, investment and the strategic projection of power, particularly in the South China Sea.
Nevertheless, the other BRICS have an important role to play in legitimating China’s “other options.”
Each is committed to reforming the international system and to building a more multipolar world; but they have not necessarily reached a consensus about what a new order should look like.
Under South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, the nation is once again asserting leadership on the African continent.
This could entail a greater focus on Africa within the BRICS, but as South Africa pursues the continent’s interests in addition to its own, it will have to remain open to working not just with the BRICS, but also with other developing nations and coalitions.
The ultimate goal must be to support and reinforce a rules-based order. After all, that is in Africa’s interests.
Elizabeth Sidiropoulos is chief executive of the South African Institute of International Affairs.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Late last month, Beijing introduced changes to school curricula in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, requiring certain subjects to be taught in Mandarin rather than Mongolian. What is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) seeking to gain from sending this message of pernicious intent? It is possible that he is attempting cultural genocide in Inner Mongolia, but does Xi also have the same plan for the democratic, independent nation of Mongolia? The controversy emerged with the announcement by the Inner Mongolia Education Bureau on Aug. 26 that first-grade elementary-school and junior-high students would in certain subjects start learning with Chinese-language textbooks, as
For the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), China’s “century of humiliation” is the gift that keeps on giving. Beijing returns again and again to the theme of Western imperialism, oppression and exploitation to keep stoking the embers of grievance and resentment against the West, and especially the US. However, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that in 1949 announced it had “stood up” soon made clear what that would mean for Chinese and the world — and it was not an agenda that would engender pride among ordinary Chinese, or peace of mind in the international community. At home, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) launched
There are worrying signs that China is on the brink of a major food shortage, which might trigger a strategic contest over food security and push Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), already under intense pressure, toward drastic measures, potentially spelling trouble for Taiwan and the rest of the world. China has encountered a perfect storm of disasters this year. On top of disruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic, torrential rains have caused catastrophic flooding in the Yangtze River basin, China’s largest agricultural region. Floodwaters are estimated to have already destroyed the crops on 6 million hectares of farmland. The situation has been
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With