The MeToo movement has arrived in Asia, which is an impressive feat in a region where many societies are still highly patriarchal, where speaking out will bring shame to victims of sexual harassment.
Although the movement has been slow to take off in Taiwan, things seem to be starting to move after a former gymnast came forward to accuse her former coach — a respected figure in the field — of sexually assaulting her from 1996 to 2006, starting when she was a junior-high school student.
She posted the police report form on a popular Internet message board, which apparently prompted another of his former students to come forward with similar allegations, and it is believed that there are several more victims.
Hopefully, MeToo in Taiwan will not stop there. However, while Taiwan seems to have a favorable environment for women on paper, with comprehensive gender equality and laws against sexual harassment, several news reports this week show that this nation needs a MeToo movement just as much as any other.
These reports are concrete proof that Taiwan still has a way to go toward full gender equality and that the nation definitely needs more people to stand up and break the stigma that society unjustly places on the victims of sexual abuse or harassment and domestic violence instead of the perpetrators.
One of the biggest problems continues to be the obscenely light sentences handed down by so-called “dinosaur judges” to perpetrators of sexual assault and harassment, as highlighted by a ruling last week by the Judicial Yuan’s Court of the Judiciary.
The court in 2016 found that former Taipei High Administrative Court judge Chen Hung-pin (陳鴻斌) had sexually harassed his assistant and ruled that his actions warranted dismissal. The verdict was quickly hailed as a landmark ruling: the first time a Taiwanese court had ordered a judge to be dismissed for sexual harassment.
However, on Thursday last week, that verdict was overturned on appeal. The court decided to fine Chen an amount equal to his annual salary, saying that Chen was repentant and that only three of the eight incidents of misconduct constituted harassment.
This is completely unacceptable. It is a slap in the face to all the women of Taiwan and those who have fought hard to achieve the institutional safeguards in place for women in this nation today.
While Democratic Progressive Party lawmakers and other politicians have slammed the second verdict and the Control Yuan has announced it would file an appeal, the average person must make it clear that such rulings have no place in today’s society.
Kissing, hugging — even verbal abuse — is sexual harassment and that needs to be made clear to all corners of society.
Another sign that Taiwan needs the MeToo movement is the recently released survey by the Medical Laborers’ Working Conditions Reform Task Force, which found that 80 percent of female physicians and 63 percent of male physicians have been sexually harassed at work — but only 3 percent filed a formal complaint.
Among those who said they did not file a complaint, 33.7 percent were worried that they would be punished for complaining.
Even more dispiriting, a survey by the Ministry of Labor found that 54.7 percent of female respondents said they would “laugh it off and take no action” if confronted with sexual harassment in the workplace.
However, sexual harassment and sexual abuse are no laughing matter. Girls and women should not feel that they will be punished, made fun of or otherwise stigmatized if they report harassment or abuse. They must be given the support they need and their attackers must face punishment, not slaps on the wrist.
The numbers do not lie. Let the victims start coming forward.
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
RSS