Over the past two weeks, the public has gotten a good look into how Beijing’s two-handed Taiwan strategy is being put into practice.
First, on Feb. 28, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office announced 31 measures it billed as “incentives,” saying that the new regulations would benefit Taiwanese, as they were devised specifically to improve the rights of Taiwanese studying, working, living or starting a business in China.
Just as Taiwanese were wondering how sincere Beijing’s goodwill was in introducing these measures, reports emerged about incidents that revealed China’s hypocrisy.
The Swedish Tax Agency on Feb. 28 announced that Taiwan would be listed as a province of China (Taiwan, Provins i Kina), instead of the Republic of China (Republiken Kina, Taiwan), on its Web site starting yesterday.
Another media report surfaced yesterday, saying that China has pressured the Swiss government to list the hometown of Taiwanese living in Switzerland as “China” instead of “Taiwan” on their Swiss driver’s licenses. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs responded that it is still verifying the matter with the Swiss government, but China has no doubt damaged its image once again in the eyes of Taiwanese.
Beijing authorities have repeatedly said that they wish to win Taiwanese hearts and minds. Their most recent expressions of “generosity” are clearly part of a scheme to lure more Taiwanese to China.
Chinese officials hope such benefits will help Taiwanese view them as being less hostile, and even foster a gradual sense of Chinese identity that favors unification with “the motherland” — but the truth is: Money can’t buy love.
Granted, there will be people who swarm to the other side of the Strait for monetary gains and better employment opportunities, seemingly unconcerned by the fact that Taiwan’s international presence is constantly being belittled by Beijing.
However, the material benefits being proffered by China cannot hide the true nature of the Chinese Communist Party, which all too soon reveals its overbearing self and usurps the right of individuals to make their own democratic choices.
There is a saying that has been circulating among Taiwanese businesspeople based in China: “Earn Chinese money, but vote for the Democratic Progressive Party.”
The truth is that the longer Taiwanese live in China, the more they discover just how different Taiwan’s precious air of freedom and democracy is from the air in China under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), with his new limitless term.
China might pat itself on the back, thinking that it has outsmarted Taiwan, but the truth is that such a brazen two-handed strategy works only to enforce the perception that China is a hypocrite.
Premier William Lai (賴清德) on Tuesday last week said that “the core of the incentive measures or the ‘1992 consensus’ seeks to benefit China, which wants to annex Taiwan eventually.”
If China continues to disrespect Taiwan’s sovereignty, but continues to deploy sneaky moves in its oppression of Taiwan’s international space, it can expect the resentment that Taiwanese feel toward Beijing to grow — no matter how many more so-called “incentives” Beijing plans to roll out.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS