Many members of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) have commemorated the 30th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death, and they want to use Chiang to promote unity within the KMT and raise public support for the party.
However, Chiang is an important reason for the sad lives of the KMT and all Taiwanese.
In 1949, Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) used his planned counterattack on China as an excuse to establish martial law and prepare Chiang Ching-kuo to be his successor.
Beginning the same year, then-US president Harry Truman sent the Seventh Fleet to assist in the defense of Taiwan, simultaneously protecting it and showing that Taiwan did not have the power required to strike back at China.
The following Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty restricted the KMT’s military deployments to the islands of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu, and the 1958 artillery war at Kinmen forced the KMT to give up any plans of a counterattack against China. All these showed that any talk of striking back at China was nothing but blatant lies.
Unable to strike back at China, the system established under martial law allowed dictator Chiang Kai-shek to prepare Ching Ching-kuo. After all, what chance would he ever have had of getting his hands on power if not for Chiang Kai-shek?
The wrongful cases against former commander-in-chief of the Republic of China Army Sun Li-jen (孫立人), then-Taiwan governor K.C. Wu (吳國楨) and Free China magazine publisher Lei Chen (雷震) were attacks on pro-US and pro-democracy forces and the corruption case against then-minister of economics Yin Chung-jung (尹仲容) was an attack on the economic power of former Taiwan governor Chen Cheng (陳誠).
These cases were all attacks on political enemies to promote personal interests that had a massive effect on the political situation, and Chiang Ching-kuo’s fingerprints were all over them.
Some people might think that without Chiang Ching-kuo, Taiwan would not have remained peaceful and Taiwanese would never have experienced the following prosperity. Most people think that KMT corruption, not communist spies, was the main reason that communism succeeded in China
Chiang Ching-kuo was in charge of the secret police, anti-spy work and preventing infiltration by communist spies, but it was later proven that many of the resulting cases were miscarriages of justice.
If there had been no Chiang Ching-kuo and Taiwan had simply copied the KMT’s Chinese system of government, Sun, Wu and Lei could have survived.
Taiwan used to be more developed than China, and it was less affected by war, which allowed it to develop faster than China.
Furthermore, no one has ever claimed that martial law is a guarantee for positive economic development. Conversely, the economic system under the KMT’s Martial Law era allowed the party to monopolize economic resources, which is not good for development.
There is no example in world history of economic development showing that martial law is a guarantee for successful development, which is evidenced by the backward economic development of communist countries.
Had it not been for the lie about striking back at China and the Martial Law era, Taiwan would have become a democracy a long time ago.
When people wax nostalgic about Chiang Ching-kuo, what is it that they remember? His dictatorial ways? His White Terror? The advantages they enjoyed due to his consolidating the KMT’s monopoly on political power?
Lin Shiou-jeng is an associate professor in the Department of Marketing and Logistics Management at Chung Chou University of Science and Technology.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
The war between Israel and Iran offers far-reaching strategic lessons, not only for the Middle East, but also for East Asia, particularly Taiwan. As tensions rise across both regions, the behavior of global powers, especially the US under the US President Donald Trump, signals how alliances, deterrence and rapid military mobilization could shape the outcomes of future conflicts. For Taiwan, facing increasing pressure and aggression from China, these lessons are both urgent and actionable. One of the most notable features of the Israel-Iran war was the prompt and decisive intervention of the US. Although the Trump administration is often portrayed as
RSS