After the Ministry of Health and Welfare amended the long-term care payment system, media reported that a monthly salary of NT$40,000 for long-term care workers would no longer be just a dream. This means that Taiwanese university graduates would not have to settle for a starting salary of NT$22,000 per month if they are willing to work hard and devote themselves to what they are doing.
Low pay is not the only reason for the nation’s shortage of long-term care workers, there is also the problem of how to retain talented people within the profession.
Traditionally, people show the greatest respect toward doctors. While they are indispensable to any medical team, cross-disciplinary cooperation is necessary to give patients the best care possible.
Due to the public’s lack of understanding of professional division of labor and because there is no proper system for promotion for medical workers, it is difficult for them to gain the recognition they deserve.
Under these circumstances, many qualified nurses, physiotherapists and pharmacists have no choice, but to change careers or look for employment abroad.
There are many schools offering courses on long-term care, but if there is no system for promotion, and if people are not recognized and respected for what they do, they would leave the profession.
To reduce the outflow of talented people from the nation’s long-term care sector, the government should raise their salaries.
However, the salary hikes should not be the same across the board; the satisfaction rates of patients and their family members should be taken into consideration.
A patient of mine has employed a Taiwanese caregiver and is paying a high salary, because the caregiver is willing to learn, is easy to communicate with, asks serious questions during treatment and helps the patient do physical therapy activities at home, enabling the patient to achieve double the results with half the effort.
To build an adequate promotion system, the nation could learn from Japan’s commercialization of the long-term care industry. Japanese care providers are formally called “care workers.” They can take a national certification exam and be promoted to “case managers” and be qualified to run a care-service institution if they pass.
Taiwanese care providers can enter a job after taking lessons and accumulating practical work experience, but there is no chance for promotion.
If the long-term care industry was commercialized, a promotion system could be introduced.
Care providers are not generally treated as experts and some patients’ family members treat care workers as servants, asking them to do chores. While it might be necessary for caregivers to help elderly people who live alone with housework, it would be much better for them to focus on care services.
They should help patients cough up sputum, feed them, turn them over, help them take a shower and exercise. Patients’ family members should also learn these techniques and use them appropriately to help provide the best care.
The work hours of caregivers are limited, while the family is responsible for taking care of the patient the rest of the time.
The retention of talented long-term care workers should not just be a matter of offering higher salaries. It is equally important to teach people about the medical role of care providers. If people can show long-term care professionals respect and provide the positive feedback that they deserve, more talented personnel would be willing to enter the long-term care industry.
Cho Chiung-yu is an associate professor at National Cheng Kung University’s Department of Physical Therapy.
Translated by Eddy Chang
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s