Taiwan’s modern and contemporary history dates from more than a century ago. During the early period between 1895 and 1945, it was subject to Japanization. The middle period from 1945 to 1995 was one of sinicization, and the late period, since 1995, has seen an unfinished process of Taiwanization.
Starting from the nation’s Aborigines, Taiwan has passed through various stages, including Dutch colonization, followed by the Kingdom of Tungning founded by Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功), better known as Koxinga, and then by the Qing Dynasty. In the process, it has formed a cultural profile that is different from China’s and manifests itself in daily life.
Taiwan is separated from China by a stretch of sea. It is closer to the East Asian nations of Japan and North and South Korea, and more distant from the countries of Southeast Asia. That is because the former fall within the cultural sphere of Chinese characters, while the latter moved away from China’s cultural orbit when they came under European colonial rule.
Taiwan has shifted the emphasis of its relations in the region from a northbound orientation to a southbound one, hoping to expand its trade, business and cultural relations with Southeast Asian countries so as to reduce the risk that results from excessive reliance on China.
Taiwan is a special place — a political, economic and cultural entity that is a nation and yet is not one. After World War II, Taiwan, unlike other former colonies in Asia, did not choose to become independent. Instead, it became entangled in the all-out war between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Consequently, Ilha Formosa, which could have grown into a small, but beautiful country, cannot stand tall on the world stage, even though it does in fact exist.
Confused ideas about the “motherland” led some Taiwanese before and after World War II to look to China and identify with it. Some joined the KMT camp, while others joined that of the CCP. Some leaned to the left, others to the right and some sat on the fence. Some Taiwanese spent time in China during and soon after the time of Japanese rule, and came to follow and depend on the party-state system of the KMT or the CCP.
When China passed from the KMT party-state to the CCP party-state, what were rich and powerful people with Chinese connections to do? Members of the Taiwan-based Lien (連) family, for example, shuttle to and fro between the two sides and regard China as their ancestral homeland.
Taiwanese have gone through Japanization and Sinicization, and are now at Taiwanization, but it has not progressed to the point where everyone can identify with Taiwan as a nation in itself.
When efforts are made to revise and improve the parts of the national education syllabus related to the nation’s history and languages, they often face resistance from the ideology of the KMT’s party-state, which, frighteningly, is connected with the ideology of the CCP’s party-state. The concept of China has become a heavy ball and chain that binds Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China.
Taiwan’s special historical makeup, on Taiwan itself and on the outlying islands, has written a rainbow cultural chorus whose vowels are Aboriginal culture and the ancient Chinese culture that came to Taiwan during the Tang Dynasty, while its consonants are Japanese and European cultures, as well as a new kind of Chinese culture and American culture that arrived after World War II.
Reforms to educational content concerning the languages, history and geography of the nation should be developed on such a basis, rather than stubbornly locking Taiwanese up in a “Chinese” prison cell.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Julian Clegg
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission