The US Congress in the past few years has passed legislation in support of Taiwan, including “an act to direct the [US] Secretary of State to develop a strategy to obtain observer status for Taiwan in the International Criminal Police Organization [Interpol] and for other purposes” and the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 providing for military exchanges between Taiwan and the US.
The Taiwan Travel Act bill is the latest addition to this legislative drive. Taiwanese officials and the public have embraced this development with enthusiasm.
In the public eye, this is a welcome development, as it apparently affirms the US’ commitment to Taiwan time and again. Yet, in the eye of a constitutional law student, these congressional acts should be treated with caution.
To begin with, all the foregoing congressional statutes are more symbolic than transformative. In terms of style, they consist of two main parts: The first sets out the factual findings by Congress; the second and main part provides for policy direction.
It is the second part that merits attention. Apart from the legislation on Taiwan’s participation in Interpol, the other two legal instruments imply no legal obligation whatsoever in their main section. Instead, Congress deliberately chose the word “should” instead of “shall” when it comes to visits between US and Taiwanese officials.
As any law student can instantly tell, “should” simply expresses the subjective expectation of Congress. It only imposes moral obligations on the US administration at best, lacking any enforceability or justiciability.
It is true that the legislation on Taiwan’s participation in Interpol adopts the wording “shall,” which denotes a congressional directive to the government, but the legal obligations imposed by Congress are flimsy.
The US government’s main duty is to report back to Congress what strategy it develops and adopts with respect to Taiwan’s participation in Interpol as an observer, as well as “instruct[ing]” Washington’s Metropolitan Police Department to “officially request” that Interpol consider the matter.
It is not hard to see why Congress has legislated in support of Taiwan in this thinned form. The US adheres to the principle of separation of powers, not the doctrine of legislative sovereignty. It is the executive branch that takes the helm in steering foreign affairs.
The US Constitution prohibits Congress from micromanaging military administration and diplomatic relations, not to mention sending military delegations overseas or receiving foreign government visitors. This explains why “should” is chosen over “shall” in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 and the Taiwan Travel Act bill.
Taiwanese officials and the public had better exercise caution when they welcome the recent US Congress-driven Taiwan-friendly movement. Friends of Taiwan also need to think about how to better spend their capital in the advocacy for Taiwan. Preoccupation with legislative symbolism will only deepen the false sense of security pervading Taiwanese society.
Kuo Ming-Sung is an associate professor at the University of Warwick’s School of Law.
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
Taiwan last week finally reached a trade agreement with the US, reducing tariffs on Taiwanese goods to 15 percent, without stacking them on existing levies, from the 20 percent rate announced by US President Donald Trump’s administration in August last year. Taiwan also became the first country to secure most-favored-nation treatment for semiconductor and related suppliers under Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act. In return, Taiwanese chipmakers, electronics manufacturing service providers and other technology companies would invest US$250 billion in the US, while the government would provide credit guarantees of up to US$250 billion to support Taiwanese firms
RSS