Formosa Plastics Group (FPG) is about to apply for a renewal of the expiring permits for their petroleum coke and bituminous coal-fired power plant at the Mailiao (麥寮) petrochemical complex in Yunlin County.
There have been media reports that the nation’s energy supply will be tight this summer. This is why the Ministry of Economic Affairs has coordinated the extension of permits in the hope of avoiding potential energy rationing.
However, Yunlin County is a Class III control region for PM2.5 pollution and academic studies show that residents in the coastal areas of Yunlin and Changhua counties face greater health risks than in other areas.
The risk of power rationing can therefore not be the only factor when deciding whether to approve the permit extensions.
Several disputes have surrounded the extension of Formosa Plastic’s permits in recent years.
When the company applied for a permit extension for the Mailiao cogeneration plant, the Yunlin County Government requested that FPG reduce the use of raw coal by 20 percent and shortened the validity of the permit to two years. Formosa Plastics then filed an administrative appeal that was rejected last month.
The verdict showed that the county government’s review was based on preventing air pollution, protecting public health and gradually reducing the use of raw coal, and that it neither constituted abuse of the government’s discretionary powers nor violated the principle of fairness.
In September last year, Formosa Chemicals and Fibre Corp applied for an extension of three cogeneration boiler process operation permits.
The Changhua County Government rejected the applications on grounds that the company had failed to follow through on its pledge to implement the stricter controls required by an earlier environmental assessment. The decision led to a dispute.
The Environmental Protection Administration’s (EPA) Petitions and Appeals Committee on March 10 rejected the county government’s administrative ruling, although it affirmed the legitimacy of the county government’s desire to protect air quality.
This series of events tells us that reviews of permit applications offers an excellent opportunity to push companies to improve their environmental management practices.
Several dozen permits for the Mailiao plant are about to expire, and the authorities should use this as an opportunity to take a stern look at the applications and set an example for how to link the issues of controls and permits.
Taiwan is not unique in using reviews of applications for permit renewal as a means to reduce the environmental impact of factories on their neighboring areas.
In Rodeo, California, Unocal’s Rodeo San Francisco Refinery released noxious gases in August 1994, but due to an inadequate environmental monitoring system and the resulting lack of information, local residents were unable to provide evidence of any harmful emissions.
With the assistance of experts, residents developed methods for citizen science to overcome shortcomings in air pollution monitoring, which helped them gather evidence and point to shortcomings in US government and industry monitoring standards.
Rodeo residents discovered that when the refinery needed to apply for permits — and only then — it was willing to deal with residents directly.
Therefore, the approval of an application for land use was used to demand that the company install the most advanced real-time air monitoring equipment and that monitoring data be made available in real time.
The review was also used to gain an understanding of the limitations of different kinds equipment and the need for maintenance and upgrades to monitoring systems, and to demand public participation in the monitoring program.
The process of approving the permit provided an excellent bargaining chip for residents. They demanded that the refinery renew and upgrade its monitoring systems and improve analysis of environmental data.
Reviews before permit renewals offer an opportunity to evaluate and tighten demands for environmental management.
The government should respond to regional environmental problems by using its discretionary powers and stop treating reviews as a formality — a matter of approval or rejection.
Instead, the permit system should be treated as an opportunity to hold plant operators accountable, and demand that they respond to local concerns and improve the local environment.
The Californian experience has showed that involving local residents in air pollution monitoring and jointly developing methods adapted to the local experience, combined with information transparency, will not only improve monitoring methods and responses to local environmental problems, it will also help rebuild public trust in the government’s environmental management.
Nothing should stop the central government and the Yunlin County Government from taking advantage of the permit extension process for the Mailiao complex to stress its commitment to environmental governance and ease the longstanding environmental problems in the coastal regions of Yunlin and Changhua counties.
Tu Wen-ling is a professor in the public administration department of National Chengchi University. Shih Chia-liang is a post-doctoral researcher in the same department.
Translated by Perry Svensson
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS