The Executive Yuan last month submitted a draft amendment to the Mining Act (礦業法), which is now under review at the Legislative Yuan. The amendment focuses on Article 6 and Article 72-1 of the act, and are aimed at decriminalizing mining activities conducted by Aborigines on their traditional land.
The government said the revisions would recognize the rights of Aborigines over natural resources and meet the basic requirements set by international conventions, such as the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the Indigenous Peoples Basic Law (原住民族基本法).
Statistics show that there are 246 mines in Taiwan, with least 186 still active. The total area of these active mines is 48,953 hectares, or about 1.8 times the size of Taipei.
More surprisingly, more than 80 percent of the active mines are in traditional Aboriginal lands and most did not undergo an environmental impact assessment before they began operations.
Environmental campaigners such as Citizen of the Earth and the Wild at Heart Legal Defense Association, Taiwan have pointed out the significance of assessment requirements, saying the proposed amendment would still be insufficient to protect the environment.
It is the act’s articles 31 and 47 that are the most problematic. They not only allow resource developers to automatically renew their operating permits for existing mines — without a proper safety or environmental impact review — but also deprive Aborigines of their rights to free, prior and informed consent and effective participation.
However, the proposed amendment does not clearly address these issues. Although environmental regulations in many jurisdictions increasingly call for assessments on mining operations, follow-up monitoring remains the weakest stage of environmental management.
A recent study revealed that, even though an assessment is mandated by law, there is no guarantee that related monitoring can truly be sustained over the entire lifespan of large mining projects.
To respond to this challenge, new opportunities and techniques for improving civil participation have been created through the negotiation of environmental agreements between affected communities and mining industries. This new policy development is now common in the natural resource sectors of developed economies such as the US, Australia, the EU and Canada.
For example, the agreement negotiated between BHP Billiton and community groups for the Ekati diamond mine in Canada established an independent assessment follow-up monitoring agency, which includes members of indigenous communities, government agencies and the company.
The agreement requires the company to establish environmental management plans, submit detailed compliance reports and implement a closure and reclamation plan.
In addition to various successful individual environmental contracts, international organizations, such as the World Bank and the International Bar Association’s Mining Law Committee, also provide useful model mining development agreements that can serve as the benchmark for negotiation and international practices.
These international lessons show that trust among stakeholders is vital for sustainable mining. Taiwan should create policy incentives for innovative environmental contracting and balance the bargaining power between corporations and communities (especially long marginalized Aborigines).
The first step would be to enhance data transparency of the mining sector.
Yang Chung-han is a doctoral candidate at the University of Cambridge and a member of the Taipei Bar Association.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
RSS