The Ministry of Economic Affairs earlier this month issued a statement to urge the EU to conclude ongoing negotiations and sign a bilateral trade and investment agreement with Taiwan. The EU commission launched such talks with Taiwan after a formal resolution adopted by the European Parliament in July.
In a recent policy communication, Trade for All, the EU announced its new Asia-Pacific investment strategy and highlighted the significance of Taiwan for the eurozone’s economic interests.
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) also recognizes this bilateral economic accord would strengthen investment protections for both sides and inspire Taiwanese entrepreneurs, especially small and medium-sized enterprises, to invest in the EU regions and boost local economies. Both sides acknowledge the potential benefits of creating a better business climate with this investment agreement.
A modern and comprehensive investment agreement should go beyond the limited concept of “economic growth” or “investment protection” and cover a wide range of issues under the umbrella of “sustainable development,” such as labor standards, environmental protection and social cohesion.
Regarding environmental rules, the initial objective of these related clauses is to assess and monitor the environmental impacts of trans-boundary economic activities. In this context, contracting parties should not lower their domestic environmental standards for the purpose of attracting foreign investment.
The trend for synergies between investment and environment can be observed in international policy agendas. The UN’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and, particularly, the Addis Ababa Action Agenda suggest that foreign direct investment is a crucial component of sustainability efforts.
Such investment can use various policy instruments — such as private-public partnerships, “green” funds and other hybrid market mechanisms — to harness technological and financial resources to promote climate change adaptation, energy efficiency, biodiversity and other pro-environmental projects.
This month, Taiwan and Germany signed a Joint Declaration of Intent on Cooperation in the Field of Energy Transition, which focuses on collaborations on electricity market liberalization and clean energy technologies. Also this year, Taiwan and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development celebrate 25 years of cooperation. The bank’s Taiwan Technical Cooperation Fund has invested about 42 million euros (US$43.9 million) in more than 270 projects, mainly in the “green” energy, transport and communication sectors and future “smar” cities.
Reviewing all current environmental collaborations is a feasible way to consider what synergistic components could be further integrated in the forthcoming EU-Taiwan economic agreement. Because a bilateral treaty provides an excellent opportunity to legalize the vague climate-friendly rhetoric and reserve policy space for environmental regulations on specific matters — for example, energy trade and investment.
The EU-Taiwan economic deal might become a new and strong catalyst for Taiwan’s green economy transition. A well-tailored framework requires sufficient public consultation and horizontal policy coordination.
The Ministry of Economic Affairs should welcome a broad involvement of the related governmental agencies (ie, Environmental Protection Administration and International Cooperation and Development Fund (財團法人國際合作發展基金會), civic society and industrial stakeholders. Such involvement is essential for the future successful implementation of treaty provisions.
Yang Chung-han is a doctoral candidate at the University of Cambridge and a member of the Taipei Bar Association.
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
In 2009, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) made a welcome move to offer in-house contracts to all outsourced employees. It was a step forward for labor relations and the enterprise facing long-standing issues around outsourcing. TSMC founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) once said: “Anything that goes against basic values and principles must be reformed regardless of the cost — on this, there can be no compromise.” The quote is a testament to a core belief of the company’s culture: Injustices must be faced head-on and set right. If TSMC can be clear on its convictions, then should the Ministry of Education
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) provided several reasons for military drills it conducted in five zones around Taiwan on Monday and yesterday. The first was as a warning to “Taiwanese independence forces” to cease and desist. This is a consistent line from the Chinese authorities. The second was that the drills were aimed at “deterrence” of outside military intervention. Monday’s announcement of the drills was the first time that Beijing has publicly used the second reason for conducting such drills. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership is clearly rattled by “external forces” apparently consolidating around an intention to intervene. The targets of
RSS