The Ministry of Economic Affairs earlier this month issued a statement to urge the EU to conclude ongoing negotiations and sign a bilateral trade and investment agreement with Taiwan. The EU commission launched such talks with Taiwan after a formal resolution adopted by the European Parliament in July.
In a recent policy communication, Trade for All, the EU announced its new Asia-Pacific investment strategy and highlighted the significance of Taiwan for the eurozone’s economic interests.
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) also recognizes this bilateral economic accord would strengthen investment protections for both sides and inspire Taiwanese entrepreneurs, especially small and medium-sized enterprises, to invest in the EU regions and boost local economies. Both sides acknowledge the potential benefits of creating a better business climate with this investment agreement.
A modern and comprehensive investment agreement should go beyond the limited concept of “economic growth” or “investment protection” and cover a wide range of issues under the umbrella of “sustainable development,” such as labor standards, environmental protection and social cohesion.
Regarding environmental rules, the initial objective of these related clauses is to assess and monitor the environmental impacts of trans-boundary economic activities. In this context, contracting parties should not lower their domestic environmental standards for the purpose of attracting foreign investment.
The trend for synergies between investment and environment can be observed in international policy agendas. The UN’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and, particularly, the Addis Ababa Action Agenda suggest that foreign direct investment is a crucial component of sustainability efforts.
Such investment can use various policy instruments — such as private-public partnerships, “green” funds and other hybrid market mechanisms — to harness technological and financial resources to promote climate change adaptation, energy efficiency, biodiversity and other pro-environmental projects.
This month, Taiwan and Germany signed a Joint Declaration of Intent on Cooperation in the Field of Energy Transition, which focuses on collaborations on electricity market liberalization and clean energy technologies. Also this year, Taiwan and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development celebrate 25 years of cooperation. The bank’s Taiwan Technical Cooperation Fund has invested about 42 million euros (US$43.9 million) in more than 270 projects, mainly in the “green” energy, transport and communication sectors and future “smar” cities.
Reviewing all current environmental collaborations is a feasible way to consider what synergistic components could be further integrated in the forthcoming EU-Taiwan economic agreement. Because a bilateral treaty provides an excellent opportunity to legalize the vague climate-friendly rhetoric and reserve policy space for environmental regulations on specific matters — for example, energy trade and investment.
The EU-Taiwan economic deal might become a new and strong catalyst for Taiwan’s green economy transition. A well-tailored framework requires sufficient public consultation and horizontal policy coordination.
The Ministry of Economic Affairs should welcome a broad involvement of the related governmental agencies (ie, Environmental Protection Administration and International Cooperation and Development Fund (財團法人國際合作發展基金會), civic society and industrial stakeholders. Such involvement is essential for the future successful implementation of treaty provisions.
Yang Chung-han is a doctoral candidate at the University of Cambridge and a member of the Taipei Bar Association.
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
US President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday last week announced it would impose sanctions on the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a vast paramilitary organization that is directly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and has been linked to human rights violations against Uighurs and other ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. The sanctions follow US travel bans against other Xinjiang officials and the passage of the US Hong Kong Autonomy Act, which authorizes targeted sanctions against mainland Chinese and Hong Kong officials, in response to Beijing’s imposition of national security legislation on the territory. The sanctions against the corps would be implemented
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose