The Arctic Ocean might seem remote and forbidding, but to birds, whales and other animals, it is a top-notch dining destination.
“It’s a great place to get food in the summertime, so animals are flying or swimming thousands of miles to get there,” said Kevin Arrigo, a biological oceanographer at Stanford University.
However, the menu is changing. Confirming earlier research, scientists on Wednesday reported that global warming is altering the ecology of the Arctic Ocean on a huge scale.
Illustration: Lance Liu
The annual production of algae, the base of the food web, increased an estimated 47 percent between 1997 and last year, and the ocean is greening up much earlier each year.
These changes are likely to have a profound impact for animals further up the food chain, such as birds, seals, polar bears and whales. However, scientists still do not know enough about the biology of the Arctic Ocean to predict what the ecosystem will look like in decades to come.
While global warming has affected the whole planet in recent decades, nowhere has been hit harder than the Arctic. This month, temperatures in the high Arctic have been as much as 2.22oC above average, according to records kept by the Danish Meteorological Institute.
Last month, the extent of sea ice was 28.5 percent below average — the lowest for October since scientists began keeping records in 1979. The area of missing ice is the size of Alaska and Texas put together.
Since the mid-2000s, researchers such as Arrigo have been trying to assess the effects of retreating ice on the Arctic ecosystem.
The sun returns to the Arctic each spring and melts some of the ice that formed in winter. Algae in the open water quickly spring to life and start growing.
These algae are the base of the food chain in the Arctic Ocean, grazed by krill and other invertebrates that in turn support bigger fish, mammals and birds.
Arrigo and his colleagues visited the Arctic in research ships to examine algae in the water and to determine how it affected the water’s color. They then reviewed satellite images of the Arctic Ocean, relying on the color of the water to estimate how much algae was growing — what scientists call the ocean’s productivity.
The sea’s productivity was rapidly increasing, Arrigo found. Last year he and his colleagues published their latest update, estimating that the productivity of the Arctic rose 30 percent between 1998 and 2012.
However Mati Kahru, an oceanographer at the University of California, San Diego, was skeptical. As an expert on remote sensing, he knew how hard it is to get a reliable picture of the Arctic Ocean.
The ocean is notoriously cloudy and algae are not the only thing that is tinting the water. Rivers deliver tea-colored organic matter into the Arctic Ocean, which can give the impression that there is more algae in the water than is actually there.
Kahru and his colleagues decided to take an independent look, scouring satellite databases for images taken from 1997 to last year — “every image available,” he said.
The scientists used a mathematical equation to determine how the color in each pixel of each image was determined by algae, runoff and other factors. Kahru decided that Arrigo was right: The Arctic Ocean has become vastly more productive.
Marcel Babin, an oceanographer at Universite Laval in Quebec who was not involved in the new study, said that the researchers had done “very careful work” that confirmed the earlier studies.
“It’s an important finding,” he said.
Not only is the Arctic Ocean producing more algae, but it is doing so sooner each year.
“These blooms are coming earlier, sometimes two months earlier,” Kahru said.
In fact, the bloom might be coming even sooner than satellites can record. On research cruises, Arrigo and his colleagues have found that open water is no longer a requirement for algae to grow.
The ice has gotten so thin that sunlight reaches through it.
“Now they’re not even waiting for the ice to melt,” Arrigo said of algal organisms.
If we stay on our current course, pouring more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, the Arctic will only get warmer, perhaps becoming ice-free in the summer. If algae can find more nitrogen and other nutrients in the ocean, its productivity may continue to rise.
Scientists cannot yet say what the ecological effects of this transformation will be.
“It is probable it will have an impact on the whole food web,” Babin said.
Babin and his colleagues have been studying that impact over the past two summers on an expedition called the Green Edge Project, which has studied the ecology in Baffin Bay off the coast of northern Canada. They hope to present the first results of the survey next year.
Some species might thrive because they can graze on the extra algae. However, if the ecosystem comes to life earlier in the year, many species might be left behind.
Fish larvae might not be able to develop fast enough. Migrating whales and birds might show up too late. A lot of the extra algae might drop to the sea floor by then, untouched.
“It’s going to be a different Arctic unless we turn things around,” Arrigo said.
As the Soviet Union was collapsing in the late 1980s and Russia seemed to be starting the process of democratization, 36-year-old US academic Francis Fukuyama had the audacity to assert that the world was at the “end of history.” Fukuyama claimed that democratic systems would become the norm, and peace would prevail the world over. He published a grandiose essay, “The End of History?” in the summer 1989 edition of the journal National Interest. Overnight, Fukuyama became a famous theorist in the US, western Europe, Japan and even Taiwan. Did the collapse of the Soviet Union mark the end of an era as
During a news conference with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida in Tokyo on Monday, US President Joe Biden for the third time intimated that the US would take direct military action to defend Taiwan should China attack. Responding to a question from a reporter — Would Washington be willing to get involved militarily to defend Taiwan? — Biden replied with an unequivocal “Yes.” As per Biden’s previous deviations from the script of the US’ longstanding policy of “strategic ambiguity” — maintaining a deliberately nebulous position over whether the US would intervene militarily in the event of a conflagration between Taiwan and
Will the US come to the defense of Taiwan if and when China makes its move? Like most friends of Taiwan, I’ve been saying “yes” for a couple decades. But the truth is that none of us, in or out of government, really know. This is precisely why we all need to show humility in our advice on how Taiwan should prepare itself for such an eventuality. After all, it’s their country, and they have no choice but to live with the consequences. A couple weeks ago the New York Times published an article that put this reality in stark relief. As
US President Joe Biden has done it again — for the third time in the past nine months he has stated that the US will defend Taiwan. And for the third time, his administration officials have rushed to “clarify” that US policy toward Taiwan “has not changed” and Washington still follows its “one China policy.” That is the same scenario that played out with two other presidents. When asked the question posed to Biden in 2001, then-US president George W. Bush said Washington would do “whatever it took” to defend Taiwan against Chinese aggression. In 2020, then-US president Donald Trump