German Chancellor Angela Merkel just announced her run for a fourth consecutive term and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has started efforts to extend his term to 2021. Both are facing major domestic and external problems, in particular stimulating their economies. Looking at their political achievements in terms of hard figures, there is cause for concern. Still, their attempts to extend their leadership have met with strong support.
If Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union wins the election in fall next year, she would match former German chancellor Helmut Kohl’s 16-year term in office, and if Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party wins the 2018 election, Abe would be the longest-serving Japanese prime minister since World War II, ruling Japan for 10 years and breaking Japan’s run of short-term Cabinets that has lasted since the 1990s. Either would be of profound significance for any democratic country.
Do Merkel and Abe have anything in common in how they lead their countries? Merkel in September last year announced a policy to take in Middle Eastern refugees, which has led to a huge financial burden due to their slow entry into the labor market and it has also had effects on social order. As a result, her approval ratings have dropped and she has lost voters.
Abe is not doing much better. Although more than 80 percent of Japanese opposed a security law allowing the Japan Self-Defense Forces to engage in foreign military conflicts and thousands of people took to the streets in protest, it was passed by the Japanese parliament last year. Although the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement, finalized in February, was strongly opposed by Japanese farmers and boycotted by Japan’s Democratic Party, Abe persisted and the Japanese House of Representatives approved it in a vote this month, submitting it to the Japanese House of Councilors for deliberation.
Merkel and Abe have made decisions ignoring public opinion, so why do a majority of voters continue to support their bids to extend their terms in office? In a survey conducted by polling company Emnid last week, 55 percent of respondents supported Merkel’s re-election bid, despite an August poll by the organization showing that 50 percent of respondent opposed her re-election. In Japan, an NHK poll last week showed that Abe’s approval stands at 55 percent.
Perhaps support for their strong leadership is related to external factors, as US president-elect Donald Trump’s victory is affecting the international framework. However, the main factor changing public opinion is probably the charisma the two have displayed through their ability to make decisions and stick to their values in the face of crisis, which has made them stand out in their own countries.
When you think you are right, “you should go for it, even if 10 million people stand in your way,” a Chinese saying goes. This is the quality a leader of any organization must have, but it does not mean acting without considering the consequences. Rather, it means taking concrete action when addressing a problem.
For example, Germany has been discussing raising its retirement age to 69 years to relieve financial pressure, and Japan has passed an agricultural white paper to increase exports of agricultural, aquatic and food products and to turn small farmers into an aggressive army of agricultural talent to boost their confidence in opening markets.
If national leaders do not make decisions or have a “Plan B” for controversial issues, but just allow the public to discuss and decide issues in referendums, then anyone can play the role of negotiator, and once leaders are perceived as being overly cautious, unwilling to take responsibility and unable to make decisions, they will not be able to win public respect or build authority.
Lessons can learned from the examples of others. In Taiwan, opinion polls have repeatedly shown that a majority of respondents favor national pension reform. The call for reform had already been issued during former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) presidency, long before President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) took office. However, the government insists on delaying this controversial issue until next year and refuses to simplify the process, despite advice from the outside world.
The public will have to decide if this is a good government.
The long debate on public holidays and workweek hours shows that the government lacks cross-ministerial integration and is incapable of coming up with a comprehensive plan. What a waste of its legislative majority. In short, it does not dare take action.
As a result of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) stubbornness and refusal to communicate through eight years of wrongheaded policies, the public expressed its opinion and kicked the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) out of office, while at the same time demanding that the Tsai administration adopt effective measures based on clear public opinion. If the government gives up its responsibility to lead because it wants voters to express their opinions yet again before making a decision, then what was the point of the Jan. 16 elections?
Absolute rule means absolute responsibility. The government should display the leadership and efficiency that is expected of a government. A winning finish is more important than a strong start.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and