President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and Premier Lin Chuan (林全) have been meeting with the media and non-governmental organizations (NGO), which might be a good sign that the government is moving in a better direction.
Prior to Tsai’s inauguration in May, most people expected that she would turn a new page for the nation and that the government would be the “best at communicating” as she promised after she won January’s election.
However, in the past three months, the government’s decisionmaking mechanism seems to be a little chaotic, with many policy decisions coming as surprises.
For example, the government seemed to reverse its stance on whether workers should be entitled to seven holidays per year when a shift to mandatory two-day weekends takes place or whether workers should be required to have one day off after six days of work.
The government seemed determined at first, then after speaking with business representatives, it changed its stance, even canceling the day-off-after-six-days policy, with that decision made on July 31, the day before the policy was to be implemented.
Such rushed decisions and sudden changes have triggered protests from almost all sides affected. In the debate over labor issues, businesses complained that the government made decisions unilaterally, while labor unions said they were not consulted.
News outlets have expressed discontent over the government’s seeming unwillingness to communicate with the media — mainly criticizing the Executive Yuan and the Presidential Office.
Failure to communicate might not be the only reason for the sharp drop in popularity for the president and the premier, but it must have contributed a great deal.
An opinion poll released on Monday by Taiwan Indicators Survey Research showed that Tsai’s approval rating dropped below 50 percent, while her disapproval rating rose to 39.8 percent.
As for the premier, his approval rating was 37.3 percent, dropping below his disapproval rating of 40.4 percent.
Perhaps the nation’s top two leaders have realized the serious nature of the political crisis they face: Lin, who has often been reluctant to be on the front lines, arranged sessions to speak with labor and business representatives on Friday, while Tsai invited reporters to a reception in Taipei yesterday, where she spoke and answered questions.
Will things improve? That is unknown, but at least the president and premier are starting to interact directly with the media, as well as NGOs.
Keeping the communication channels open and smooth is the first step. If the government sincerely listens to what people have to say and takes into consideration other opinions when making decisions, it would certainly improve a great deal.
The administration of former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was often criticized for being opaque, acting willfully and feeling good about itself — despite protests — which were important factors in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) landslide defeat in the legislative and presidential elections.
People voted for Tsai and her Democratic Progressive Party because they believed that combination would bring change.
Certainly, the public is slightly disappointed three months into Tsai’s administration, but it is never too late to make changes and win hearts again.
Local media reported earlier this month that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) criticized President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for referring to China as a “neighboring country,” saying that this is no different from a “two-state” model and that it amounts to changing the cross-strait “status quo.” I find it quite impossible to understand why civilized Taiwan continues to tolerate the existence of such a deceitful group that believes its own lies. The relationship between Taiwan and China is the relationship between two countries, and neither has any jurisdiction over the other — this is the undeniable “status quo.” Those who believe in the
On Thursday, China applied to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) — a regional economic organization whose 11 member countries have a combined GDP of US$11 trillion. That is less than China’s 2019 GDP of US$14.34 trillion, so why is China so eager to join? China says there are two main reasons: To consolidate its foreign trade and foreign investment base, and to fast-track economic and trade relations between China and member countries of the CPTPP free-trade area. China’s bilateral trade with these countries grew from US$78 billion in 2003 to US$685.1 billion last year, mostly because of China’s 2005
With the Taliban’s return to power in Afghanistan, China has remarketed its East Turkistan Islamic Movement (ETIM) concerns. Beijing urged the Taliban to make a clean break with the movement and asked the US to blacklist it again. While some are still debating whether the movement exists, it is not the core of the matter because its existence neither justifies China’s Uighur policy nor sheds light on its concerns after the withdrawal of the US from Afghanistan. Is China really worried, and if so, is it because of the movement? This question needs to be answered. When Chinese officials first acknowledged
US President Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) talked on the telephone on Thursday last week, the first time the two leaders have done so since Biden assumed the presidency. While each side sought to put their own gloss on the content of the conversation, some common ground did emerge. Biden reportedly said that both sides have a joint responsibility to ensure that competition between the US and China does not spiral into conflict and that there is no reason that the two nations are destined to fall into this trap. The day after the phone call, the Financial Times reported