In preparation for the Hong Kong Legislative Council’s elections next month, the Hong Kong government has added a demand that is not part of the Legislative Council Ordinance: Candidates must sign a document to recognize that Hong Kong is an inalienable part of China.
As there is no basis for this requirement, parties in the pan-democracy camp, as well as the three pro-independence parties — Hong Kong Indigenous, Younginspiration and the Hong Kong National Party — refused to sign the document.
On Saturday, the Hong Kong government informed the candidate with the strongest pro-independence views, Chan Ho Tin (陳浩天) of the Hong Kong National Party, that he was not qualified to run.
Interference by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is increasing, although this interference is restricted to “phantom voters” or offering small bribes. These are sure to be the actions of political parties and the CCP’s liaison office in Hong Kong, but the Hong Kong government continues to say that it is impartial.
In the past, no candidate was ever disqualified because of their political stance, and based on the experiences of election observers, the vote-counting process has been fair and impartial.
Hong Kongers still believe in the “one country, two systems” model, because government officials continue to remain neutral in elections and the courts still maintain their independence and neutrality.
The use of a requirement that does not exist in the Legislative Council Ordinance to disqualify Chan’s candidacy is a matter of filtering candidates according to political standards. If pro-independence candidates are disqualified today, then candidates demanding that those behind the 1989 Tiananmen Massacre be held responsible could well be the next to be disqualified, and that could even be followed by pro-Beijing candidates opposed to Hong Kong Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying (梁振英).
That would turn the “one country, two systems” model into an empty political slogan: not only would it no longer be possible to use it to try to cheat Taiwanese, even Hong Kongers would stop believing in it. Judging from Leung’s actions, China has clearly abandoned any attempts to use the “one country, two systems” model to deceive Taiwanese.
If taking a soft approach does not work, then it is likely to take a tough approach toward Taiwan. Looking at the issue from this perspective, Taiwan must be more proactive in preventing a Chinese invasion and it must remove any corrupt pro-China elements and other people that China has secret dealings with from its military forces and national security organizations. This is necessary, because China could take military action against Taiwan at any time and for any reason, ignoring the reactions of the US, Japan and other nations.
Martin Oei is a political commentator based in Hong Kong.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry