Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) looked like a snake oil salesman when he held up a half-empty bottle of fake “Taiping Island water” at a news conference, while simultaneously attempting to smear the name of National Taiwan University professor Chiang Huang-chih (姜皇池), saying “not one word is true” of an article written by Chiang last year.
Ma continued to sound like a “professional student” (informer for the government): As an angry young man, he chimed in with China in his defense of the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), and as an angry old man, he is working hard to show that Itu Aba Island (Taiping Island, 太平島) is really an island and not a “rock.”
Now that the Permanent Court of Arbitration has passed its ruling on the South China Sea dispute between China and the Philippines, Ma is attempting to shut the stable door after the horse has bolted and draw attention away from the main issue with trivial diversions and by shifting the blame onto someone else.
US officials have always used the neutral term “claimant nation” when discussing South China Seas disputes, whether referring to Taiwan, China, Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia or Brunei. In fact, the greatest damage inflicted upon Taiwan in the tribunal’s verdict was its repeated reference to Taiwan as the “Taiwan Authority of China.”
However, Ma’s belated “advice” on the dispute surprisingly contained no objection to the name the tribunal chose to give to Taiwan. This is because Ma and Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) so-called “1992 consensus” is all about there being only “one China.” By signing up to the “1992 consensus,” Ma has surrendered Taiwan’s claimant status as a sovereign nation.
Despite not having protested against the tribunal’s undermining of Taiwan’s status, Ma nevertheless chose to criticize the administration of President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), saying it only passively defended sovereignty over Itu Aba: This is utter nonsense.
On Thursday last week, the New York Times published a report, including photographs, of Tsai aboard a warship issuing instructions to naval officers. The report was spread across four columns and was a clear demonstration of Taiwan’s status as a sovereign nation. This kind of positive publicity for the nation is priceless and it is something that Ma would not even be able to buy with money.
It should come as no surprise that Ma, a man who was thoroughly brainwashed in his youth — and then handed an important position of power — is himself a firm believer in the power of brainwashing. This is why he suggested changes to high-school curriculum guidelines and organized training camps to create a connection in the minds of the younger generation with an island 1,637km from Taiwan. Did he really believe that would be effective?
In an article published by the Chinese-language United Daily News, Ma offered the government 10 pieces of advice on how it should go about upholding Taiwan’s rights in the South China Sea. Two of the most vivid and feasible suggestions were to develop the island’s industries — such as the “Taiping Island water” he brandished during the news conference — and to encourage Taiwanese to register their households on the island.
There is no time to lose: The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) should lead by example and enlist their party’s most loyal members to move to Itu Aba and establish a new party-run business for the export of “Taiping Island water.” The KMT would be able to shock the world with its new evidence of the existence of Itu Aba “Island.”
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Edward Jones
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS