Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) looked like a snake oil salesman when he held up a half-empty bottle of fake “Taiping Island water” at a news conference, while simultaneously attempting to smear the name of National Taiwan University professor Chiang Huang-chih (姜皇池), saying “not one word is true” of an article written by Chiang last year.
Ma continued to sound like a “professional student” (informer for the government): As an angry young man, he chimed in with China in his defense of the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), and as an angry old man, he is working hard to show that Itu Aba Island (Taiping Island, 太平島) is really an island and not a “rock.”
Now that the Permanent Court of Arbitration has passed its ruling on the South China Sea dispute between China and the Philippines, Ma is attempting to shut the stable door after the horse has bolted and draw attention away from the main issue with trivial diversions and by shifting the blame onto someone else.
US officials have always used the neutral term “claimant nation” when discussing South China Seas disputes, whether referring to Taiwan, China, Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia or Brunei. In fact, the greatest damage inflicted upon Taiwan in the tribunal’s verdict was its repeated reference to Taiwan as the “Taiwan Authority of China.”
However, Ma’s belated “advice” on the dispute surprisingly contained no objection to the name the tribunal chose to give to Taiwan. This is because Ma and Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) so-called “1992 consensus” is all about there being only “one China.” By signing up to the “1992 consensus,” Ma has surrendered Taiwan’s claimant status as a sovereign nation.
Despite not having protested against the tribunal’s undermining of Taiwan’s status, Ma nevertheless chose to criticize the administration of President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), saying it only passively defended sovereignty over Itu Aba: This is utter nonsense.
On Thursday last week, the New York Times published a report, including photographs, of Tsai aboard a warship issuing instructions to naval officers. The report was spread across four columns and was a clear demonstration of Taiwan’s status as a sovereign nation. This kind of positive publicity for the nation is priceless and it is something that Ma would not even be able to buy with money.
It should come as no surprise that Ma, a man who was thoroughly brainwashed in his youth — and then handed an important position of power — is himself a firm believer in the power of brainwashing. This is why he suggested changes to high-school curriculum guidelines and organized training camps to create a connection in the minds of the younger generation with an island 1,637km from Taiwan. Did he really believe that would be effective?
In an article published by the Chinese-language United Daily News, Ma offered the government 10 pieces of advice on how it should go about upholding Taiwan’s rights in the South China Sea. Two of the most vivid and feasible suggestions were to develop the island’s industries — such as the “Taiping Island water” he brandished during the news conference — and to encourage Taiwanese to register their households on the island.
There is no time to lose: The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) should lead by example and enlist their party’s most loyal members to move to Itu Aba and establish a new party-run business for the export of “Taiping Island water.” The KMT would be able to shock the world with its new evidence of the existence of Itu Aba “Island.”
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Edward Jones
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS