Late last month, the Taiwanese fishing boat Tung Sheng Chi No. 16 was seized by the Japan Coast Guard when it was operating in the waters surrounding what Japan calls Okinotori Island, but that Taiwan says is a reef. Japan sees the waters surrounding Okinotori as its exclusive economic zone, while Taiwan sees them as the high seas. The boat was released after the owner paid a security deposit.
To address the seizure, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called two meetings of top national security officials, issued a stern statement and demanded that the Cabinet issue measures regulating the terminology used by authorities at different levels to make sure that Okinotori is referred to as a “reef,” not an “island.”
At a Tokyo news conference, Japanese Minister of Foreign Affairs Fumio Kishida said that Okinotori is an island at the southern end of Japan and that Japan cannot accept Taiwan’s “one-sided claim” that Okinotori “is a reef and not an island,” which would not entitle Tokyo to a 200 nautical mile (370km) exclusive economic zone.
Is there any connection between whether Okinotori is defined as an island or a reef and a decision concerning its legal status and claims of territorial waters and maritime rights? Does calling it an “island” mean that a claim for an exclusive economic zone is legitimate?
Australia’s Great Barrier Reef is called a “reef.” Does the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) say that Australia is not entitled to an exclusive economic zone? Does Clipperton Island, a minor territory of France in the east Pacific, enjoy an exclusive economic zone according to the UNCLOS?
Likewise, the US-administered Baker Island and Howland Island in the central and western Pacific Ocean are all called islands and the US claims an exclusive economic zone, although these claims have been seen as violating UNCLOS regulations and the US has been accused of making “excessive maritime claims.”
Calling something an “island” or a “reef” is not critical to determining maritime legal status. Islands and reefs are islands because they are surrounded by water on all sides, rise above sea level at high tide and are naturally occurring areas of land. If a rock is surrounded by water, rises above sea level at high tide and is naturally formed rock, then that rock is an island as regulated by Part 8 of UNCLOS, “Regime of Islands.”
However, UNCLOS Article 121, Clause 3, states that, “Rocks which cannot sustain human habitation or economic life of their own shall have no exclusive economic zone or continental shelf.”
If Okinotori can sustain human habitation or economic life, then it is not a rock. The territorial waters, adjacent areas, exclusive economic zone and continental shelf of Okinotori should therefore be determined based on UNCLOS regulations.
Even if Japan claims Okinotori is an island, if it cannot sustain human habitation or economic life, then it is a rock that is not entitled to exclusive economic zone or continental shelf claims, but can claim territorial waters or the adjacent area.
Japan has the right to call Okinotori an island, but if it wants to claim an exclusive economic zone it must correctly interpret and apply the regulations of Article 121, Clause 3 of UNCLOS. Japan ratified the UNCLOS in 1996 and it is thus binding.
Based on Okinotori’s geography, it can be determined that even if it is an island, it is also a rock, and does not entitle Japan to an exclusive economic zone.
It can be legally determined that Japan is violating the UNCLOS by measuring a 200 nautical mile exclusive economic zone from the Okinotori territorial baseline. This is why Japan was clearly in violation of international law when it seized the Tung Sheng Chi No. 16. Based on regulations stipulated in UNCLOS article 87, called “Freedom of the High Seas,” and 121, called “Regime of Islands,” Taiwan has the right to engage Japan and demand that it fulfill its treaty obligations.
Song Yann-huei is a research fellow in the Institute of European and American Studies at Academia Sinica.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US