Apple Inc last month ran an Apps for Earth promotion, a fundraiser for the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) to mark this year’s Earth Day. The company has announced that the proceeds from 27 apps — including popular titles like Angry Birds II, Cooking Dash 2016 and Candy Crush Soda Saga — between Saturday next week and April 24 will go to the WWF, a global conservation organization.
The cross-sector partnership between Apple and the the WWF illustrates a new technological frontier for raising environmental awareness and influencing conservation practices.
Four technological forces — mobile, social, cloud and big data — have emerged as “game changers” in the way environmental science, policymaking, consumer culture and democracy have developed.
Apps, such as Earth, give the campaigners the opportunity to engage worldwide, tech-savvy, middle-class customers and reach new financial sources.
However, billions of people around the world still live in poverty and lack essential technology for their basic needs.
Digital technologies can be environmentally unsustainable. Much technology, including smartphones, are designed to be thrown away at the first sign of trouble rather than be repaired. The volume of global electronic waste increases by a third every two years. The ugly truth is that developed economies dump most of their harmful and toxic e-waste illegally in developing nations — one in three containers from the EU contains illegal waste under false pretenses.
Moreover, the increasing scarcity of metal and mineral raw materials, the huge and irrecoverable environmental damage, and widespread bloodshed and use of child workers — also mainly in developing nations — do not prevent the development of the next “must-have” digital device. Technology can have deep geopolitical and social bias in favor of elites and to the detriment of poor people.
On Sept. 25 last year, the UN adopted 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to end poverty, protect the environment and ensure prosperity for all. Following the Millennium Development Goals, SDGs are to define global development targets and goals for the next 15 years.
The UN has recognized that technology and development are indistinguishably connected. The implementation of the SDGs has to be guided by the principle of technology justice. Therefore, two new policy mechanisms — the UN Technology Bank and the Technology Facilitation Mechanism — have been proposed to assist the least developed countries to address technology injustices.
The system requires a greater role for states to harness investment in clean and environmentally sound technologies and to ensure that technologies do not exacerbate the vulnerabilities of poor people.
On the first Earth Day in 1970, about 2 million people marched down New York’s Fifth Avenue to express a new environmental paradigm for change and call for a healthy lifestyle for all — not just for the relatively small wealthy population.
Earth Day needs to be a day for demonstration of unity and ecological sustainability.
Lawyers might approach the issue by reconsidering international treaties that govern intellectual property rights, such as Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, an international agreement administrated by the WTO — of which Taiwan is a signatory — to rebalance in favor of the least developed countries and sustainable development agendas.
Yang Chung-han is a doctoral candidate at the University of Cambridge and a member of the Taipei Bar Association.
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) earlier this month said it is necessary for her to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and it would be a “huge boost” to the party’s local election results in November, but many KMT members have expressed different opinions, indicating a struggle between different groups in the party. Since Cheng was elected as party chairwoman in October last year, she has repeatedly expressed support for increased exchanges with China, saying that it would bring peace and prosperity to Taiwan, and that a meeting with Xi in Beijing takes priority over meeting
Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs spokesman for maritime affairs Rogelio Villanueva on Monday said that Manila’s claims in the South China Sea are backed by international law. Villanueva was responding to a social media post by the Chinese embassy alleging that a former Philippine ambassador in 1990 had written a letter to a German radio operator stating that the Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島) did not fall within Manila’s territory. “Sovereignty is not merely claimed, it is exercised,” Villanueva said. The Philippines won a landmark case at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2016 that found China’s sweeping claim of sovereignty in
RSS