The US-China relationship sits atop four powder kegs: the Korean Peninsula, the East China Sea, the Taiwan Strait and the South China Sea; with the South China Sea the most likely cause of a direct confrontation between the two nations.
The dynamics of the relationship are changing; this time Washington is serious about confronting Beijing. As a result, China’s leaders have been forced to swallow their pride and make hasty peace initiatives to prevent conflict.
A book written by the founder of modern US Sinology, John Fairbank, titled The United States and China, that I read in secret during the Cultural Revolution, contains a lengthy introduction to Confucianism. It was then I realized that many Western experts on China had a habit of indulging in Confucianism, possessing a special fondness for all things China and consequently were all too willing to make excuses for the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) wicked deeds.
In contrast, in his book The Hundred-Year Marathon — China’s Secret Strategy to Replace America as the Global Superpower, contemporary US China expert Michael Pillsbury quotes extensively from the legalist school of classical Chinese philosophy, including the school of diplomacy — one of 10 schools of thought that came out of the Warring States period of Chinese history — Sun Zi’s (孫子) The Art of War and the Thirty-six Stratagems. The real China is one of hypocrisy and treachery.
Pillsbury, an influential thinker within the US national security apparatus, writes that he was originally a pro-China “panda-hugger,” who advocated US economic and military assistance to China to help its leaders realize their dream of becoming a “great nation” once again.
Pillsbury writes that he belatedly, he realized that Washington has been duped by China for the past 60 years: Beijing has no intention of initiating democratic reforms. Instead, China’s leaders have been quietly hatching a plot for global domination by 2049 — the 100th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China.
It was awful to see the US providing assistance to China following the rapprochement between the two nations initiated by former US president Richard Nixon.
Washington even thought former Chinese president Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) was a US ally and believed that his successor Jiang Zemin (江澤民) was closer still, so much so that Washington initially showed no concern when former CCP general secretary Zhao Ziyang (趙紫陽) was placed under house arrest after sympathizing with student protesters during the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests.
Former Chinese president Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) softened China’s stance toward Taiwan, which fooled the US into forming a mistaken assessment of China’s hegemonic aspirations.
In 2013 Pillsbury traveled to Beijing for the last time and met with five high-ranking officers from China’s military and 60 security affairs specialists.
It was then that Pillsbury realized how wrong he had been.
He writes that at the time, not all of his fellow officials shared his view, but that a growing number are coming over to his side and that this is altering Washington’s China policy.
The final transformation took place in September last year when Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) visited the US. According to a report in the Hong Kong media, US President Barack Obama still held hopes for Xi and used the opportunity to try to persuade the Chinese leader to give ground on the South China Sea issue.
To this end, Obama organized a private dinner, inviting only a select few of his trusted advisers, to facilitate easy communication between the two heads of state.
However, Xi remained unmoved and would listen to neither reasonable argument nor rational persuasion. Obama left the dinner seething with rage and immediately instructed US National Security Council officials to issue an order to the head of the US Pacific Command, Admiral Harry Harris, authorizing his ships to conduct navigation exercises in the South China Sea, and authorizing the use of firepower if necessary.
Only after the event did Chinese officials discover the disastrous turn of events, in particular the potential damage to the interests of senior party figures’ children, a large number of whom are living in the US. A great deal of bickering ensued within the party, although Xi was not blamed for his arrogance and ignorance. Instead, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of State Security were blamed for not providing Xi with intelligence. The Chinese military were at a loss what to do next and the Central Military Committee (CMC) was more aware than anyone else of the limitations of Chinese military force.
Therefore, orders were given not to provoke US ships and to take precautions against the accidental discharge of weapons.
In the latter half of October last year at the Xiangshan Forum — China’s alternative to the annual Shangri-La Dialogue Asian security forum — CMC Deputy Chairman Fan Changlong (范長龍) pledged that China “will not resort to force” and in doing so betrayed that China is nothing more than a paper tiger.
However, leading figures within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) still insist on using China to scare Taiwanese. President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) even visited the disputed Itu Aba Island (Taiping Island, 太平島) in January at the behest of Beijing. Such acts can no longer be described as foolish any longer, it was just low-down, dirty behavior.
Beijing’s attempt to pass itself off as an underdog has ended in failure; the US is closing in on China.
The incident has done more than intensify internal conflict within the CCP: If Beijing fans the flames of war, it might force each of China’s provincial governments to act in the interests of their own self-preservation and bypass the CCP’s centralized totalitarian regime.
That might just be the critical moment when democracy takes hold in China.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Edward Jones
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
RSS