When I was a child, I liked to make paper boats and see them float away on the Hsuchuan Canal, which passed in front of our home in Keelung. I would follow it to the mouth of the canal, which opened into the Keelung Harbor. My grandmother often said that the harbor area east of the canal was a dangerous place and warned me to stay away.
I remember how one year, this area — which used to be full of driftwood — was filled in with soil and turned into a parking lot, although a lot of people were unwilling to park their cars there because it was not “clean.”
It was only then that I found out that countless corpses had floated in that area many years before, and that the body of one of my uncles was among them, sinking to the bottom of the sea with two other bodies tied to slabs of stone with steel wire.
I learned that, during this time, my father had been detained by the police, the military police and the military headquarters, and that every time he had to pay a large ransom wrapped in a big tablecloth before he was released. I also found out that my grandfather had disappeared for more than three months and only reappeared after writing a confession. During that time, our tutor, physician and city councilor belonged to social groups that were being persecuted. This was the crackdown in March 1947 that is part of the 228 Massacre.
Every March since then, my grandmother could often be heard hiding in the dark, crying. We still feel pain in our hearts, pain that there are always people who want to hide the truth, pain because it takes time for the wounds to heal. It has been 69 years — a long time. Despite that, social justice still has not been properly served, as the government seems to think that everything is fine because it has paid compensation and holds memorial services. Is that all?
The main culprit behind the 228 Massacre is still venerated in an impressive building, looking out over Liberty Square in Taipei. Authoritarian symbols are still seen everywhere and even the government of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), which claims that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) cares a great deal about the 228 Massacre, simply goes through the motions, treating it as a soap opera.
The Ma administration is taking the same approach to the Taipei 228 Memorial Museum and the National 228 Memorial Museum as these institutions try to figure out their purpose, by first destroying the work that has been done and then weakening their function and significance. It is the same ruthlessness and ineptness with which they are running the nation, and there is no transitional justice to talk of.
We have never really hoped that the KMT, the gang that oversaw the 228 Massacre, would come to its senses, but we do pin our hopes on promises of transitional justice made by the incoming government.
However, we are not so narrow in our approach as to only care about the 228 Massacre. We have long felt that a new definition of the 228 Massacre is required: It can symbolize the various clashes and the grief that have occurred in Taiwan over the past 400 years.
We must look at the 228 Massacre from different perspectives in order to build a platform for ethnic reconciliation and create dialogue between the different ethnic groups that live in Taiwan.
Together, people must look at the suffering and pain that has taken place over the past 400 years and reach a common agreement on protecting the nation. This is the only way to bring redemption from the evils of the 228 Massacre.
Yang Chen-lung is a former executive director of the 228 Incident Memorial Foundation.
Translated by Perry Svensson
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
RSS