Gwadar is poor. When a house was recently burgled in the fishing settlement on Pakistan’s desert coast, the only items stolen were cans of fresh water — a staple that has soared in value since reservoirs dried up.
It lies in Balochistan, a province in the grip of a long-running separatist insurgency and Pakistan’s most neglected.
Yet local officials dream of a future where Gwadar becomes a second Shenzhen, the Chinese trade hub bordering Hong Kong. Visitors are told that with Chinese investment the small settlement will become a major node of world commerce boasting car factories, Pakistan’s biggest airport and a string of five-star resort hotels along Gwadar’s sparkling seafront.
Illustration: Mountain people
However, residents are aghast, and not just because the fishing community, long settled on the neck of the peninsula, will be moved to new harbors up to 40km away.
“This is all being done for China, not the people,” said Elahi Bakhsh, a fisherman bewildered by the plans to turn Gwadar into China’s deepwater access point to the Arabian Sea .
Like others he complains of chronic underdevelopment in a district judged food insecure by the UN in 2009 and a town with only rudimentary health and education services.
Bakhsh had not had enough water to wash his clothes in weeks. He and five of his colleagues turned down an offer of tea — the mandatory accompaniment to any meeting in Pakistan — in favor of bottles of mineral water.
“The whole area has been captured by the government with local people pushed aside,” he said.
If all goes to plan, the existing 80,000 population will be joined by another 2 million people over the next 20 years, including 20,000 Chinese residents, according to an official at the Gwadar Development Authority.
It was Dubai, not Shenzhen, which was being touted as the model for Gwadar’s future 10 years ago, but that initiative only succeeded in ruining countless property speculators. Officials say things are different this time because of the China-Pakistan economic corridor (CPEC), a project announced last year with pledges from Beijing of US$46 billion in investment loans.
It would help pay for the expansion of Gwadar’s currently unused deepwater port and the construction of a road network the exact route of which is subject to hot inter-provincial controversy that would connect the port to the Chinese border 1,800km to the north amid Himalayan peaks.
Pakistan hopes the corridor would turn the country into a critical land route for the world’s second-biggest economy. In theory, exporters in Xinjiang would have a much shorter journey to the Arabian Sea and international markets than via China’s eastern ports.
In practice sceptics wonder whether trucking goods over one of the world’s highest mountain ranges will ever be cheaper than existing sea routes. They suspect China is more interested in Gwadar as a potential naval base near the oil supplies of the Gulf.
Ensuring security on long stretches of road in a province wracked by a persistent, low-level insurgency is the biggest challenge to CPEC. Fear of being outnumbered by outsiders from the rest of Pakistan is fueling a violent rebellion in Balochistan.
The Pakistan-China economic corridor is a particular target, because separatists see it as a demographic threat to the native Baloch, who are thought to make up just over half of the 8 million people living in the province.
“The corridor passes through what is currently the heart of the insurgency,” said Kaiser Bengali, an economic adviser to Balochistan’s chief minister.
He said the notion that the two special brigades formed by the army will be enough to protect road traffic was “laughable.”
“If every convoy of trucks has to be accompanied by half a dozen tanks, armored carriers and helicopters the cost is going to be exorbitant,” he said.
All five rebellions that have hit the province since 1947 were underpinned by Baloch claims that Islamabad exploits the province’s extensive gas and mineral riches for the benefit of the country’s ruling establishment in Punjab.
Pakistan says arch-enemy India also stirs up trouble.
“Foreign adversaries have been more than eager to exploit any opportunity to destabilize Pakistan by harboring, training and funding dissidents and militants,” said Army Chief of Staff General Raheel Sharif, who joined the prime minister in Balochistan on Feb. 3 for the inauguration of a section of CPEC highway.
The current rebellion was triggered by the rape of a female doctor by a military officer in 2005. The year before a car bomb killed three Chinese engineers in Gwadar.
Chinese visitors say they remain worried about security despite the elaborate efforts to keep them safe. Investors and officials from Beijing only move about Gwadar accompanied by military vehicles and only after all the roads have been cleared of traffic. The road is picketed with policemen at 50m intervals.
“For the locals it’s like being a prisoner in your own town,” said Shamshad Ahmed, a retired army officer who has been coming to the town for years as part of his work at the Pearl Continental, Gwadar’s only five-star hotel that recently reopened after being mothballed for years.
“Of course they are not happy about their freedom being taken away,” he said.
The sense of containment would only increase with plans to build a security fence that would completely surround the town as the port is developed.
“Everyone coming in will have to show a residency pass so we can keep a record of who lives in Gwadar,” police inspector Chakar Khan said.
Officials in Gwadar say the main town is safe, even if trouble remains in outlying areas. Two Pakistani coast guard officials were killed on Jan. 9 and three injured by a roadside bomb in the district.
Strenuous efforts have been made to secure the thinly populated, but vast province that is about the size of Germany. The military campaign to weaken a scrappy and deeply divided insurgency has had some success and in last year separatist violence fell 36 percent to 194 attacks, according to a tally of press reports by the Pakistan Institute of Peace Studies.
However, critics say the army has disastrously mishandled the situation with improved security won at the cost of deepening alienation among the Baloch. Former moderates have been driven into the hands of increasingly intransigent separatists, detractors say.
Road users complain of routine humiliations at checkpoints where busloads of passengers can be detained for hours.
It is the issue of “missing persons” that has caused most anger. Intelligence agents, often accompanied by the paramilitary Frontier Corps, are accused of snatching suspected militants who “disappear” into secret detention sites. Many turn up dead in deserted areas, their dumped bodies often showing signs of torture.
Last year the provincial government said the bodies of 800 people linked to the insurgency were recovered between 2011 and 2014. It also estimated 950 people are still missing, although some claims go as high as 14,000 according to a 2013 report by a UN fact-finding team.
Where previous rebellions were led by tribal chieftains in northern Balochistan, who were amenable to cutting deals with the state, the current uprising is dominated by the non-tribal middle-class in Makran, the belt stretching about 200km inland from Gwadar.
And unlike in the past, rebels have targeted non-Baloch civilians. Human rights groups say more than 1,000 such “settlers” have been killed since 2006, including a teacher at a school where pupils were forced to sing the Pakistani national anthem.
Civilians from Makran complain of being caught between the insurgents and the Frontier Corps, who are fighting where the infrastructure for the China-Pakistan corridor is to be built.
“Fighting erupted when work started on the road and we had to flee our homes,” said Shahab Baloch, a shopkeeper from Hoshab who like many others was forced to find safety in a larger town. “People are living in miserable conditions but are too afraid to go back.”
In a sign of the rebels’ enduring local influence, just 4 percent of voters turned out for a provincial assembly by-election in Makran on Dec. 31 last year after insurgents warned people to stay away from the polls. A brother of one candidate was kidnapped while another had his house burned down.
Those who remain engaged in electoral politics have hardened their positions.
Akthar Mengal, leader of the Balochistan National Party (BNP) and a former chief minister of the province, said Pakistan’s leaders “look at us worse than slaves.”
“In their mind we are not a province of this country, we are a colony,” he said. “In the name of development they want to turn us into a minority in our own land.”
Efforts by the provincial government to negotiate a political solution with separatist leaders, some of whom are living in self-exile in Europe, are under way, but civilian politicians say they are powerless to restrain the military’s counter-insurgency operations.
Moderate Baloch leaders meanwhile say any deal with the insurgents must include constitutional protections for indigenous people, particularly in Gwadar where many residents feel more attachment to Oman, which owned the peninsula until 1958.
Aziz Baloch, a BNP party official in Gwadar, said a system of work and residency permits should be established so outsiders would be barred from voting in elections.
Some hope the jobs and economic activity created by CPEC will weaken support for the separatists.
However, many locals are skeptical, pointing out that people from Balochistan, with its tiny share of the national population, are entitled to only 6 percent of government jobs and are rarely qualified for the best ones.
A newspaper advertisement for jobs in March last year in Gwadar’s fisheries department offered senior, technical positions to Pakistanis from Punjab and only menial roles such as cleaners and guards to locals.
“The suspicion is that all the Baloch will get from CPEC is the right to repair punctures on Chinese tires,” Bengali said.
Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif struck a conciliatory tone in December last year at a ceremony to inaugurate a section of CPEC.
He said Balochistan must have “the first right over all resources which have been explored in the province.”
However, he also announced an upgrade for an existing highway running along the sparsely populated desert coast.
It would allow Chinese trucks to head east towards Karachi before going northwards on secure roads in other provinces, bypassing much of troublesome Balochistan entirely.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with