Some people are thick-skinned. They do not care much about what other people think. Such people know that they can get away with saying what they want. They can stand in front of others and spout platitudes about being loyal to the party and a patriot and being up for the fight, but this is little more than Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) propaganda and a carefully crafted policy designed to govern Taiwan through a “divide and conquer” strategy. And it has the gall to say that it has “class” and “standards.”
Unfortunately for the KMT, the nation’s democratization has exposed its lies. The things that it wants the public to believe just no longer ring true and people are starting to question the lies being fed to them.
The KMT wallows in peddling untruths and pulling the wool over the eyes of ordinary people. There have been, over the past few months, three occasions in which presidential or vice presidential candidates’ academic qualifications have been called into question.
First, allegations were made against the KMT’s former presidential candidate, Deputy Legislative Speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), casting doubts on the authenticity of a master’s degree she obtained in the US.
After the party had rescinded Hung’s nomination, KMT vice presidential candidate Jennifer Wang (王如玄) referred to her doctorate in law from the Renmin University of China, a degree that was not recognized by the Ministry of Education.
Then there is KMT presidential candidate Eric Chu (朱立倫) himself. Chu apparently received a doctorate in accounting from New York University (NYU) in 1991.
On the Legislative Yuan’s Web site, on the Chinese-language page on educational histories, it says that Chu taught as an assistant professor at NYU between 1990 and 1992, which would seem to indicate that he taught at NYU as an assistant professor before he received his doctorate from that institution. Could this be true?
However, according to Chu’s English-language resume, the university at which he taught as an assistant professor is listed as the City University of New York, not NYU.
On the Legislative Yuan Web site, the word “city” has been removed from the name of the school at which Chu taught, causing people to mistake it for NYU. There really is quite a difference between the two.
The KMT is fond of criticizing the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for being too “unsophisticated,” not sufficiently worldly and unable to speak foreign languages.
However, during the current election campaign, KMT legislators Alex Tsai (蔡正元), Chiu Yi (邱毅) and Alicia Wang (王育敏), always out to get DPP presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), have called for her to “open your data.”
Open her data? What does that even mean?
All three words are English, yes, but two of them are being used incorrectly, and all three strung together make absolutely no sense at all.
Here is another interesting English phrase for them to study: Own goal.
Perhaps that “open her data” was just a little joke on their part.
Nevertheless, it is no joke when you deny apologizing for false allegations when you have already submitted both a written and a verbal apology for said allegations in court.
For that is a matter of record, it is a smoking gun, but still those of “proper breeding” say that this is the simply the “orthodox” KMT.
And all that other people can say, with their short-sightedness and their lack of standards, is: “Oh, that is just the way the KMT is.”
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Paul Cooper
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS