Beijing has been sending signals that it might significantly reduce the number of Chinese allowed to visit Taiwan up until Jan. 15. This has caused widespread worry among travel agencies.
Data validates this message: the number of Chinese applicants on Dec. 3 was a mere 2,161, only 20 percent of the daily quota. However, when calmly considering the big picture, despite a temporary, albeit considerable, impact as a result of the drop in the number of Chinese visitors, the Beijing policy could prompt Taiwan’s tourism industry to develop normally.
Taiwanese travel agencies can capitalize on any adversity a decrease in Chinese tourists might bring by establishing client bases in Europe and Japan and training English-speaking and Japanese-speaking tour guides, which would maximize tourism resources. Similarly, Beijing has more than once warned Taiwan that the “one China” policy is the political foundation on which cross-strait interactions can take place. If the foundation is absent, Taiwan-China relations are bound to be shaky. However, there is no way to tell what Beijing means by “shaky.”
Is it suggesting that the service trade agreement and the trade in goods agreement would be halted?
Incidentally, that is precisely what the student movements have been trying relentlessly to achieve. Both agreements are to subject Taiwanese industry to the whims of the Chinese economy, something neither the public in general nor young people in particular want. Is Beijing suggesting the termination of the 21 cross-strait agreements, including the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA)?
As far as Taiwanese are concerned, that is not really a threat, because after the ECFA was signed, what Taiwanese have gotten in return are not benefits, but a year-by-year decrease in domestic investment and GDP growth. The younger generation has had enough of the depressed economy and an average minimum monthly paycheck of NT$22,000. If Beijing’s warning comes to fruition, the nation could use the opportunity to free itself of the bondage that cross-strait agreements imposed on it, thereby opening itself up to the wider world.
Perhaps Beijing would take more aggressive measures. For example, ordering Chinese companies to stop purchasing Taiwanese products, including products made by China-based Taiwanese companies. However, this involves China’s obligations to fulfill international treaties, such as the WTO’s Information Technology Agreement. Even if China were to ram this through with its considerable might as a major nation, its ability to keep its commitments to international agreements would be questioned. Everything comes at a price.
Losing the Chinese market would be difficult and possibly even be fatal for some Taiwanese industries, but a crisis can often turn out to be an opportunity, which could enable the economy and industries to rise from the ashes, encourage investment in Taiwan and facilitate market diversification. In four years, a new and well-off economy could surely emerge.
Perhaps Beijing is suggesting that it would isolate Taiwan? This is one of the frequently talked about options to cause major disruptions in the nation, albeit most unlikely to happen. Isolation is, after all, an international matter, and it would only push Taiwan closer toward the alliance between the US, Japan and the Philippines. History shows that economic isolation is rarely successful. Most attempts end in failure.
The real purpose of staging a meeting between President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) was so Ma could make a joint announcement with Xi to the whole world that the “Taiwanese president” acknowledges the “one China” policy, which says that Taiwan is part of China, thus implicitly binding future presidents to abide by the so-called “1992 consensus.” The problem is, the cross-strait relationship according to the “1992 consensus” over the past eight years has proved to be an economic colonial relationship, causing the Taiwanese economy to collapse and become dependent on the Chinese economy. Eight years of misery under Ma’s rule is more than enough. Just say no to the “one China” ideology that the meeting was campaigning for.
Worried the sky might fall? Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) said: “Before Heaven bestows a great responsibility upon someone, it always lets his mind be tormented, his muscles be burdened and his stomach be starved.”
Trials and tribulations are how the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) can remain in power after its expected win next month. If, on the contrary, the DPP is willing to make compromises and surrender Taiwan to China to get Beijing to agree not to “shake up” the nation, then even if the DPP achieve a landslide victory in the Jan. 16 presidential and legislative elections, it would not stay in power more than one term.
Huang Tien-lin is a former president and chairman of First Commercial Bank and a former Presidential Office adviser.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS