Beijing has been sending signals that it might significantly reduce the number of Chinese allowed to visit Taiwan up until Jan. 15. This has caused widespread worry among travel agencies.
Data validates this message: the number of Chinese applicants on Dec. 3 was a mere 2,161, only 20 percent of the daily quota. However, when calmly considering the big picture, despite a temporary, albeit considerable, impact as a result of the drop in the number of Chinese visitors, the Beijing policy could prompt Taiwan’s tourism industry to develop normally.
Taiwanese travel agencies can capitalize on any adversity a decrease in Chinese tourists might bring by establishing client bases in Europe and Japan and training English-speaking and Japanese-speaking tour guides, which would maximize tourism resources. Similarly, Beijing has more than once warned Taiwan that the “one China” policy is the political foundation on which cross-strait interactions can take place. If the foundation is absent, Taiwan-China relations are bound to be shaky. However, there is no way to tell what Beijing means by “shaky.”
Is it suggesting that the service trade agreement and the trade in goods agreement would be halted?
Incidentally, that is precisely what the student movements have been trying relentlessly to achieve. Both agreements are to subject Taiwanese industry to the whims of the Chinese economy, something neither the public in general nor young people in particular want. Is Beijing suggesting the termination of the 21 cross-strait agreements, including the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA)?
As far as Taiwanese are concerned, that is not really a threat, because after the ECFA was signed, what Taiwanese have gotten in return are not benefits, but a year-by-year decrease in domestic investment and GDP growth. The younger generation has had enough of the depressed economy and an average minimum monthly paycheck of NT$22,000. If Beijing’s warning comes to fruition, the nation could use the opportunity to free itself of the bondage that cross-strait agreements imposed on it, thereby opening itself up to the wider world.
Perhaps Beijing would take more aggressive measures. For example, ordering Chinese companies to stop purchasing Taiwanese products, including products made by China-based Taiwanese companies. However, this involves China’s obligations to fulfill international treaties, such as the WTO’s Information Technology Agreement. Even if China were to ram this through with its considerable might as a major nation, its ability to keep its commitments to international agreements would be questioned. Everything comes at a price.
Losing the Chinese market would be difficult and possibly even be fatal for some Taiwanese industries, but a crisis can often turn out to be an opportunity, which could enable the economy and industries to rise from the ashes, encourage investment in Taiwan and facilitate market diversification. In four years, a new and well-off economy could surely emerge.
Perhaps Beijing is suggesting that it would isolate Taiwan? This is one of the frequently talked about options to cause major disruptions in the nation, albeit most unlikely to happen. Isolation is, after all, an international matter, and it would only push Taiwan closer toward the alliance between the US, Japan and the Philippines. History shows that economic isolation is rarely successful. Most attempts end in failure.
The real purpose of staging a meeting between President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) was so Ma could make a joint announcement with Xi to the whole world that the “Taiwanese president” acknowledges the “one China” policy, which says that Taiwan is part of China, thus implicitly binding future presidents to abide by the so-called “1992 consensus.” The problem is, the cross-strait relationship according to the “1992 consensus” over the past eight years has proved to be an economic colonial relationship, causing the Taiwanese economy to collapse and become dependent on the Chinese economy. Eight years of misery under Ma’s rule is more than enough. Just say no to the “one China” ideology that the meeting was campaigning for.
Worried the sky might fall? Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) said: “Before Heaven bestows a great responsibility upon someone, it always lets his mind be tormented, his muscles be burdened and his stomach be starved.”
Trials and tribulations are how the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) can remain in power after its expected win next month. If, on the contrary, the DPP is willing to make compromises and surrender Taiwan to China to get Beijing to agree not to “shake up” the nation, then even if the DPP achieve a landslide victory in the Jan. 16 presidential and legislative elections, it would not stay in power more than one term.
Huang Tien-lin is a former president and chairman of First Commercial Bank and a former Presidential Office adviser.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
RSS