Can anything prevent China becoming a major player in the global semiconductor industry? The announcements by several Taiwanese semiconductor firms that they are selling non-controlling stakes to China’s Tsinghua Unigroup are an indicatation that Beijing is stepping up efforts to build its own semiconductor industry and reduce its reliance on foreign suppliers.
Those deals follow a trend of consolidation within the global semiconductor industry this year, as companies seek to counter slowing growth and rising costs. However, one implication of this tendency is that the industry might see disruption caused by the entrance of Chinese firms, as evidenced by the negative impacts of Chinese players on the solar power, LED backlight and LCD industries in recent years.
On Friday last week, Siliconware Precision Industries, the world’s third-largest chip tester and packager, made public its intention to sell a 24.9 percent stake to Tsinghua Unigroup for NT$56.8 billion (US$1.72 billion). Hours later, Siliconware’s subsidiary ChipMOS Technologies also announced that it is to sell a 25 percent stake to Tsinghua Unigroup for NT$11.9 billion. These announcements came on the heels of Taiwanese memorychip packager Powertech Technology’s decision in October to sell a 25 percent stake to Tsinghua Unigroup for NT$19.4 billion. Also last week, Taiwanese audio electronics maker Merry Electronics announced it would sell a 25.4 percent stake to Chinese connector supplier Luxshare Precision Industry for NT$3.78 billion.
Although these deals still need shareholder approval and a regulatory green light, they come at a time when growing competition and a challenging global outlook have prompted some companies in Hsinchu Science Park — Taiwan’s high-tech cradle and home to the nation’s prized semiconductor companies — to look for potential foreign buyers (including Chinese), according to a report published in the Chinese-language Business Weekly last week.
Taiwanese companies selling shares to Chinese investors does not signal the arrival of the apocalypse, as long as firms can protect their know-how while using new funds to improve operating efficiency. However, a slew of companies selling stock to overseas businesses does imply that local equities look relatively attractive to overseas investors, making them enticing takeover targets. According to Financial Supervisory Commission data, Taiwan’s listed companies are currently priced at a median of 13 times their earnings, cheaper than their peers’ price-to-earnings ratio of 16 times in Japan and nearly 15 times in South Korea. It is no surprise that wealthy Chinese investors, who have been on a global shopping spree over the past few years, are now fixing their sights on Taiwanese companies.
Even so, the government must seriously consider whether Tsinghua Unigroup’s investments would have a negative impact on Taiwan’s semiconductor sector, because the combined global market shares of Siliconware, ChipMOS and Powertech are significant and the semiconductor industry is an important aspect of the nation’s economy. In addition, in view of the aggressive acquisitions of Chinese firms in the semiconductor business the government has to consider whether the removal of a ban on Chinese investment in Taiwan’s IC design sector would be appropriate, with Tsinghua Unigroup repeatedly expressing an interest in acquiring Taiwan’s leading chip designer MediaTek and chip module maker Phison Electronics.
Several factors are driving China’s push into the global semiconductor business, including government support, access to capital and reasonable prices. How well Taiwan’s technology industry weathers the challenges facing it will provide insight into whether local firms have visionary plans for long-term development and can leverage their Chinese counterparts’ strengths.
It will also reveal whether policymakers are taking the threat of Beijing’s “Made-in-China 2025” policy seriously enough.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
RSS