After Typhoon Soudelor swept through the nation last month, I had the opportunity to chat with a group of military personnel who were cleaning up the aftermath. From them, I learned that the military’s shortage of soldiers is so serious that it has become a secret that cannot be spoken of. The public might find it difficult to believe that the military is faced with the embarrassment of no longer being able to deploy a large number of troops.
What is the cause of this shortfall? Could it be a result of Taiwan’s low birthrate? The impact of the declining birthrate has not yet made itself strongly felt, so where else could the problem lie? An analysis of the data will provide us with the answer.
There are now 215,000 people in the nation’s armed forces. If we deduct the number of irregular staff necessary for maintaining operations, the number of regular staff is 196,000. With the goal of a ratio of actual strength to authorized strength of between 87 and 90 percent, the minimum number of military personnel in peacetime should be between 170,000 and 175,000.
Since the Ministry of National Defense has set its goal for the number of volunteer soldiers for this year at more than 140,000, there is a shortfall of about 35,400 people from the original goal of about 176,000 people. The ministry estimates that the number of volunteer soldiers for next year will be 149,000, leaving a shortfall of between 20,000 and 27,000 people.
Why does the minister not recruit enough volunteer soldiers to fill all the posts? The answer is quite simple. The military has reached the upper limit for its personnel costs, which have already expanded from NT$116.1 billion (US$3.55 billion) for 460,000 people in 1996 to NT$150.4 billion for 215,000 people last year. Meanwhile, personnel costs as a percentage of the military budget have surged sharply from 38.12 percent to 49.17 percent between 2008 and last year. Since it is unable to increase the budget, the ministry’s personnel costs are squeezing out military investment and operation costs.
Since it is difficult for the ministry to perform well when it is understaffed, recruiting more personnel seems to be necessary. However, how many more people should be recruited? According to the military’s estimates, it should be able to meet the required number by recruiting 23,100 more people next year.
The problem is that the minimum monthly salary for a volunteer soldier is NT$33,625. Based on a 13.5-month annual salary — which includes a 12-month base salary and an annual bonus of 1.5 months’ pay — the ministry’s personnel costs would increase by NT$10.5 billion next year if it were to recruit that many more people. At this rate, personnel costs as a percentage of the defense budget would exceed 50 percent.
However, the monthly wage for a conscript is NT$6,070. Based on a 13.5-month annual salary, the ministry’s personnel costs would only increase by NT$1.93 billion if it were to recruit 23,100 conscripts next year.
Therefore, recruiting 23,100 conscripts instead of volunteers would save the ministry NT$8.6 billion. The military is good at math, as it tries to save money by recruiting conscripts. Its attitude is really an eye-opener, as it only cares about reaching the budget goal while breaking its own promise.
We cannot exclude the possibility that the reason the government extended conscription for one year was to save money, and this is not likely to be the last extension, because no one can guarantee that there will not be a next time.
Lin Hon-chan is a military journalist and a lecturer in the Department of Radio and Television at National Taiwan University of Arts.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with