The government’s attempt to implement changes to high-school curriculum guidelines is an outrage based on a colonial mindset and the party-state’s fear of losing power. At a time when their Republic of China (ROC) is no longer in China, the evolution of the national epistemology that has resulted from the party-state’s constant reinterpretation of itself during the democratization process — going from the view that there is the ROC on Taiwan to the idea that the ROC is Taiwan — has in effect exposed the party-state’s lies and revealed that the emperor is wearing no clothes. This revisionism is very conservative and stops short of making any real change, but these facts are something that the people who are defending the ROC party-state discourse in the hope that they will be able to perpetuate their control over Taiwan are unable to face up to.
This is why the government is using “minor adjustments” as an excuse to carry out random changes and is unwilling to change its outrageous policy. The education ministers under President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) — Cheng Jui-cheng (鄭瑞城), Chiang Wei-ling (蔣偉寧) and Wu Se-hwa (吳思華) — have met with students, yet they have chosen not to side with regular, normal education, instead choosing a colonial mindset and party-state thinking. This choice has resulted in a series of protests by students: first against the cross-strait service trade agreement and now against the handling of the high-school curriculum changes. The party-state apparatus will succumb under the wave of rising student awareness, as educational authorities that have been commandeered by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) are dealing with the students in a very different manner from how educators addressed student movements when the ROC was still in China.
During the Martial Law period, people were killed without mercy. Since the lifting of martial law and the democratization of the nation, people have been arrested without mercy. To demonstrate their dissatisfaction with Wu’s handling of the situation, students climbed over the wall of the Ministry of Education compound and entered Wu’s office. Police promptly arrested the students and reporters who followed them. What decade is the nation living in? Does the Ma regime think it still has unlimited powers bestowed by martial law?
Worst of all, these things have occurred in Taipei on Mayor Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) watch. Ko was elected with the support of his so-called “white” force, which supposedly transcended affiliation with the pan-blue and pan-green camps, and it was hoped Ko would bring real reform to Taiwan’s political system. However, Ko’s response to the changes to the curriculum guidelines and his handling of the arrest of students and journalists by the police, have demonstrated that he is not running a progressive administration, leaving many disappointed.
Prior to the defeat of the KMT by the Chinese Communist Party, the KMT treated young Chinese students in a similarly outrageous way, but, at the time, teachers strongly supported the students and showed great strength of character. In 1949, following momentous change in China, the KMT retreated to Taiwan. The party has yet to learn from its historic setback, instead choosing to walk in vain along a road that leads to nowhere, to the widespread indignation of Taiwanese. The democratization movement has provided a chance for Taiwan to shift toward localism — its participants and supporters of freedom now have an opportunity to build the nation together. Unfortunately, the KMT is obsessed with having lost China — in their hearts, Taiwan is nothing more than a colonial outpost.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Perry Svensson and Edward Jones
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
RSS