Many years ago, Taiwan implemented a public housing policy. However given the state of the real estate market at the time and the belief that government should not compete with private construction companies for profit, the policy was canceled. Today, in order to carry out housing justice, the construction of social housing has become an unstoppable trend.
Recently, the Ministry of Finance made it clear that it plans to build public housing in Taipei’s Huaguang Community (華光社區), one of three benchmark projects for government-owned land. However, the government should think twice before building public or social housing in prime areas.
Prime land should be used for grand development projects. The Huaguang project is close to the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall and the Yongkang street shopping area.
There are several major organizations in this area, such as Chunghwa Telecom Co, Chunghwa Post Co, National Chengchi University’s Center for Public and Business Administration Education and Tamkang University’s Division of Continuing Education, making this a rare piece of Taipei prime property.
Whether the site will be turned into a financial center, a business complex or a green area, it offers a flexible option for Taipei’s future urban development.
The rent for social housing should be fair and affordable. Construction should be of good quality, and public transportation should be convenient.
If the government builds social housing on the site of the Huaguang Community, although the location meets the requirement for transport, it would face difficulty offering fair and affordable rent.
If the rent is low and affordable, it will become extremely difficult to find an apartment there in the future. Putting aside the question of whether the rent would hurt housing prices in the neighborhood, it is unfair to the general public when only a few lucky ones can move into such units.
If the rent follows the average level in the area, it is unlikely to meet the affordable housing requirement, so that would not work either.
The construction of social housing requires overall planning and land should be acquired from a variety of sources.
Generally, the volume and location of social housing units in Taipei’s urban area should be carefully planned to match local job opportunities and should be matched with a future management plan. The best policy is to integrate a complete social housing strategy.
There are many ways to increase the number of social housing units. The government could use publicly owned land for urban renewal developments or donate land in exchange for floor area incentives in private urban renewal projects Such methods would not only increase the volume but also avoid a negative image of the units as they are mixed with other houses.
The government could build social housing units to meet public needs by year and district according to urban planning, but there is no need to build a large number of units in the best downtown areas.
Building social housing on prime land would not achieve fair and affordable rent, tenants would be far from their workplaces and such units would not be mixed with regular housing.
Moreover, it may kill the potential of the city’s urban development. The authorities should think twice before building a large number of social housing units in prime areas.
Justin Sun is an associate professor in the Department of Land Economics at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
RSS