Many years ago, Taiwan implemented a public housing policy. However given the state of the real estate market at the time and the belief that government should not compete with private construction companies for profit, the policy was canceled. Today, in order to carry out housing justice, the construction of social housing has become an unstoppable trend.
Recently, the Ministry of Finance made it clear that it plans to build public housing in Taipei’s Huaguang Community (華光社區), one of three benchmark projects for government-owned land. However, the government should think twice before building public or social housing in prime areas.
Prime land should be used for grand development projects. The Huaguang project is close to the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall and the Yongkang street shopping area.
There are several major organizations in this area, such as Chunghwa Telecom Co, Chunghwa Post Co, National Chengchi University’s Center for Public and Business Administration Education and Tamkang University’s Division of Continuing Education, making this a rare piece of Taipei prime property.
Whether the site will be turned into a financial center, a business complex or a green area, it offers a flexible option for Taipei’s future urban development.
The rent for social housing should be fair and affordable. Construction should be of good quality, and public transportation should be convenient.
If the government builds social housing on the site of the Huaguang Community, although the location meets the requirement for transport, it would face difficulty offering fair and affordable rent.
If the rent is low and affordable, it will become extremely difficult to find an apartment there in the future. Putting aside the question of whether the rent would hurt housing prices in the neighborhood, it is unfair to the general public when only a few lucky ones can move into such units.
If the rent follows the average level in the area, it is unlikely to meet the affordable housing requirement, so that would not work either.
The construction of social housing requires overall planning and land should be acquired from a variety of sources.
Generally, the volume and location of social housing units in Taipei’s urban area should be carefully planned to match local job opportunities and should be matched with a future management plan. The best policy is to integrate a complete social housing strategy.
There are many ways to increase the number of social housing units. The government could use publicly owned land for urban renewal developments or donate land in exchange for floor area incentives in private urban renewal projects Such methods would not only increase the volume but also avoid a negative image of the units as they are mixed with other houses.
The government could build social housing units to meet public needs by year and district according to urban planning, but there is no need to build a large number of units in the best downtown areas.
Building social housing on prime land would not achieve fair and affordable rent, tenants would be far from their workplaces and such units would not be mixed with regular housing.
Moreover, it may kill the potential of the city’s urban development. The authorities should think twice before building a large number of social housing units in prime areas.
Justin Sun is an associate professor in the Department of Land Economics at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
In 2009, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) made a welcome move to offer in-house contracts to all outsourced employees. It was a step forward for labor relations and the enterprise facing long-standing issues around outsourcing. TSMC founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) once said: “Anything that goes against basic values and principles must be reformed regardless of the cost — on this, there can be no compromise.” The quote is a testament to a core belief of the company’s culture: Injustices must be faced head-on and set right. If TSMC can be clear on its convictions, then should the Ministry of Education
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) provided several reasons for military drills it conducted in five zones around Taiwan on Monday and yesterday. The first was as a warning to “Taiwanese independence forces” to cease and desist. This is a consistent line from the Chinese authorities. The second was that the drills were aimed at “deterrence” of outside military intervention. Monday’s announcement of the drills was the first time that Beijing has publicly used the second reason for conducting such drills. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership is clearly rattled by “external forces” apparently consolidating around an intention to intervene. The targets of
RSS