The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has to endure the ignominy of being simultaneously watched over by the US and confined by China. The US likes to keep a close eye on Taiwan, because although Japan renounced Taiwan as a colonial territory, under the terms of the US-directed San Francisco Peace Treaty — which entered into force in 1952 and officially ended World War II in the Asia-Pacific region — Taiwan was not reassigned to any other nation. The US’ Taiwan Relations Act also contains relevant clauses, while China’s continued persistence in its claim of sovereignty over the ROC squatters on Taiwan means that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has yet to break free from China’s spell.
The US of course acts in its own national interests, so when it established diplomatic relations with the People’s Republic of China (PRC), it acknowledged — but did not recognize — China’s claim of sovereignty over Taiwan. Peace and stability in East Asia is important to the US.
Although China has been unable to alter US policy on Taiwan, Beijing concentrates all its efforts on the KMT, which no longer possesses absolute control over Taiwan. The KMT, which still seeks to retain power through the electoral process, is trying very hard to deceive the public, but a succession of former KMT officials and politicians have unscrupulously prostrated themselves at the feet of China. The KMT sees Taiwan as its personal possession to be traded off; Taiwanese should not allow them to divest Taiwan of its power. The stage on which the KMT operates is also a sacrificial altar: They are two sides of the same coin.
The public has high hopes that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) can build a new and independent Taiwan. The KMT, masquerading as China, colonized Taiwan and is bent on creating a one-party state. The two main political parties are extremely important to determining the development of Taiwan as a fully fledged state. Next year’s presidential election is set to be a decisive battle: If the DPP wins, the nation would move in a more Taiwan-centered direction, whereas if the KMT wins, the nation would continue to move in the opposite direction.
However, the threat of China’s containment and US nannying often causes the discourse and strategies of the main parties to become confused. The KMT is especially apt to stir up trouble and blur the issues where the DPP’s policies differ from its own. In particular, some DPP politicos, harboring ulterior motives, love to make irresponsible remarks, revealing a KMT-like propensity to switch political positions with chameleon-like ease. The high proportion of Taiwanese who acknowledge Taiwan is a separate nation from China are left confused; and those who wish Taiwan to gain de jure independence from China are left feeling frustrated.
DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) policy of maintaining the so-called “status quo” is established on the premise of Taiwan as a “sovereign and independent nation, its current name being the Republic of China.” In sticking to the KMT’s previously amended “bottom line,” Tsai is seeking to reduce the threat of external interference in next year’s legislative election. What is more important is that these conservative values are both innovative and progressive.
Aside from any future full de jure independence from China, this will enable the DPP to provide what a great number of Taiwanese long for: To belong to a normal nation. Taiwanese, in their support for the DPP — and Tsai as its presidential candidate — must unite behind the party and make the US and China acknowledge Taiwan’s basic right to self-determination.
Lee Min-yung is a poet and political commentator.
Translated by Edward Jones
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
“Can you tell me where the time and motivation will come from to get students to improve their English proficiency in four years of university?” The teacher’s question — not accusatory, just slightly exasperated — was directed at the panelists at the end of a recent conference on English language learning at Taiwanese universities. Perhaps thankfully for the professors on stage, her question was too big for the five minutes remaining. However, it hung over the venue like an ominous cloud on an otherwise sunny-skies day of research into English as a medium of instruction and the government’s Bilingual Nation 2030
RSS