One controversy after another has followed the Buddhist Compassion Relief Tzu Chi Foundation because it has monopolized and misused people’s kindness and compassion over the years, leading to an outburst of discontent. Just as aftershocks follow a major earthquake, the Tzu Chi incident is normal.
Of course, damage has been done to Tzu Chi’s golden brand and to its donors.
There is no need to talk about how to turn crisis into opportunities. What is needed is consideration of how to reshape Tzu Chi’s role to prevent history from repeating itself.
Tzu Chi’s Dharma Master Cheng Yen (證嚴法師) is said to have been inspired by Mother Teresa and aspires to win the Nobel Peace Prize.
However, a look at the life of Mother Teresa shows someone who devoted her whole life to helping others silently, without seeking to make a big name for herself.
She was “the world’s greatest beggar,” so poor that kindness was the only thing in her possession. She did not possess vast properties or a long string or titles, like CEO or chairperson of some corporation.
She was usually pictured humbly stooping down to serve people on the front line, neither playing the role of a supreme master nor instructor giving spiritual or theoretical lectures to followers.
This is something that Cheng and her followers should reflect upon.
Asking the Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital to emulate Mother Teresa by giving wholehearted free services to the poorest of the poor instead of the rich might be a little too much, but they could at least emulate Saint Mary’s Hospital Luodong in Yilan County, which destroys patients’ IOUs and receipts every three or five years.
That should not be too difficult to do, should it?
A group or foundation that is purely religious or charity-oriented usually faces market limitations.
By contrast, Tzu Chi receives tens of billions of New Taiwan dollars in donations each year from its donors, both big and small. The combined force of religion and charity are undoubtedly inseparable, just as the combined effect of religion and charity is undeniable.
However, Tzu Chi should take into account religion’s high standards of morality and the compassion of charity when managing and dealing with public donations.
It is not a problem for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation — a pure charity organization — to make large investments in stocks, but questions arise when Tzu Chi, which is both a religious group and a charity organization, puts religion aside and does the same as the Gates Foundation as if it was purely a charity.
There is no reason why Tzu Chi should not be able to implement the openness and transparency that is demanded of politics.
No one is denying that Tzu Chi has done a lot of good deeds, such as charity, disaster relief and humanitarian work. The problem is that just because these deeds are noble does not mean the process is perfect and flawless, and thus need not be transparent.
If Tzu Chi knows that a large donation comes from bribes or embezzled money, taking it and using it to perform good deeds is not acceptable.
Moreover, Tzu Chi claims that special donations are used only for a stated purpose, but it beggars belief that its donors have asked that their donations be used to purchase stocks, funds and land in industrial areas and conservation zones.
As if that were not outrageous enough, donations have been used to purchase stocks or risky high-yield bonds in Monsanto, Boeing and tobacco company Altria, as well as to buy land in industrial areas and conservation zones for rezoning and development.
As for Tzu Chi’s disaster-relief accounts, it is shocking to find that its disaster relief staff wages, year-end, Mid-Autumn Festival and Dragon Boat Festival bonuses are all listed as disaster-relief expenses.
Society apparently mistakenly thought that its disaster-relief personnel were “volunteers.”
Lay devotees are urged to see the emptiness of liquor, sex, fortune and temper. Is it not reasonable to ask that ordained Buddhist monks and nuns should also be able to see the emptiness of fame and fortune?
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired associate professor from National Hsinchu University of Education.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS