In his will, Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) expressed the hope that his spirit would always be with his “comrades and compatriots” — these last words sound creepy to a lot of people.
Chiang’s followers and their own followers in the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) have not followed his words and they have abandoned his anti-communist spirit — all they do is insist that Taiwanese students and the Taiwanese public always be surrounded by his cold bronze statues.
Placing statues of someone everywhere and promoting individual worship is a fascist trick, and it runs counter to the values of a democratic country.
Has anyone who has ever gone to Washington seen a bronze statue of former US president George Washington? The largest bronze statue in Washington is that of former US president Thomas Jefferson, and the most popular one is that of US marines raising a flag on Iwo Jima during World War II.
Since many people think that Chiang should be held responsible for the 228 Massacre, many of the statues of Chiang that are to be found in every corner of Taiwan were spray-painted by protesters on the eve of 228 Memorial Day last month.
Surprisingly, some KMT members claimed that without Chiang, Taiwan would long ago have fallen under Beijing’s rule and become part of China. However, if the standard for deciding who should be honored with a statue is to be based on a person’s contribution to the maintenance of Taiwan’s independence, Chiang is not the greatest contributor, and there are many other people who must not be forgotten.
First, North Korea’s rookie leader Kim Jong-un’s grandfather, Kim Il-sung, contributed to Taiwan’s independence the most. After Kim launched a war against South Korea, then-US president Harry Truman, who had first chosen not to involve the US, decided to send the US Seventh Fleet to the Taiwan Strait.
Second, former US secretary of state John Foster Dulles’ grandfather, John Foster, who also served as secretary of state, deserves a statue. After Foster left his post, he was hired by the Qing Dynasty as a diplomatic consultant, assisting Chinese official Li Hongzhang (李鴻章) in the negotiations of the Treaty of Shimonoseki with Japan. Eventually, China ceded Taiwan and Penghu to Japan, severing the ties between the Qing empire and Taiwan and Penghu.
Third, years after Foster’s involvement in China’s cession of Taiwan and Penghu to Japan, Dulles dominated the signing of the peace treaty with Japan, also known as the Treaty of San Francisco, which was signed between the Allied powers and Japan.
He was strongly opposed to the British suggestion that Taiwan and Penghu be returned to China, which is why the treaty merely states that “Japan renounces all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores,” leaving the status of Taiwan and Penghu undecided. In addition, he also prohibited Chiang from launching a counterattack against Japan and thus helped maintain the “status quo,” according to which Taiwan is not a part of China.
Chiang’s followers should stop talking nonsense and humiliating him. They should be satisfied to always be surrounded by his spirit, instead of statues of him, and they should eliminate the last vestiges of fascist rule and the nightmares of the Taiwanese people.
In democratic Taiwan, a diversity of statues is needed for us to commemorate outstanding talent in all domains nurtured by this land. This would make Taiwan both more truthful and better.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS