Christianity is thriving in China. There might be more Christians than Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members.
Beijing’s sensitivities to religion are well known. Religion offers a competitive world view to the party. The latter fears many Christians, especially Catholics, have loyalties beyond China’s borders. Religion brings people together in ways that might eventually influence politics.
In its early days, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) responded harshly to religious activity, but official policy has moderated over time. There is an increasing amount of reluctant toleration of religious belief. However, there is no national approach. The treatment of religious believers varies regionally. For instance, authorities in Wenzhou, sometimes called the Jerusalem of China, have lately enforced more restrictions than many other cities and provinces.
In contrast, Beijing appears to have a more relaxed policy. Last year, I visited a church of about 800 people in the capital. It operated openly, attracted many young people and hosted dozens of baptisms on the Sunday I attended.
I saw a car in traffic that sported the traditional Christian “fish.” A friend of mine who lives in Beijing talked of hearing Christian music in malls and seeing people carry Bibles in public.
Ironically, the lesson of the West’s experience with religion is that the best way for a government to avoid conflict between believers and political authorities is to provide the greatest freedom possible. Obviously there have been many strains of Christianity throughout the centuries. However, the faith emphasizes a transcendent commitment to God while accommodating many different political perspectives.
The apostle Paul, whose ministry benefited from the order imposed by the Roman Empire, urged submission to the ruling authorities. However, there were exceptions, most obviously when secular rulers sought to impede the exercise of faith.
For instance, when the Jewish leadership in the Sanhedrin instructed the apostles Peter and John to no longer preach about Jesus’ death and resurrection, they responded that they had to obey God rather than men: “We cannot help speaking about what we have seen and heard.”
The original disciples and their followers persevered despite episodic persecution.
Ironically, the Romans found Christians to be good citizens. Indeed, the latter’s commitment to better living today and belief in heavenly rewards tomorrow caused Christians to ameliorate some of the social problems evident in the ancient world.
Only when more abusive emperors demanded to be worshiped as gods did Christians resist, often at the cost of their lives. Contra the empire’s expectations, persecution did not extinguish religious faith.
As Christianity became the majority faith in the West, the faithful began to play a much larger political role. However, in general they sought to shape, not overturn, the political order. And their greatest concern always was the status of their faith, both individually and communally. The worst battles between religious and civil powers occurred when the latter sought to exercise spiritual authority.
The PRC does not easily fit into the Western experience. However, one lesson clearly applies. The best way to minimize political confrontations between church and state is to reduce government restraints on religion. Christians have no unified view of politics, but believers everywhere agree on the importance of being allowed to worship God.
Interfering with the ability of people to live their faith guarantees, requires resistance. Whatever the government’s objectives, the effect will be social conflict. Believers will perceive the state to be challenging their core faith.
The CCP cannot win this battle. For years, Christianity’s growth was concentrated in rural areas, but has recently spread to the cities and reached a better educated population. Based on existing growth rates, there could be nearly 250 million Christians in China by 2030.
Beijing hopes to make Christianity conform to China. Gu Mengfei of the Three-Self Patriotic Movement, which represents legal Protestant churches in China, said that the PRC desires to “encourage more believers to make contributions to the country’s harmonious social progress, cultural prosperity and economic development.”
Such harmony is best achieved by eliminating the greatest source of potential conflict, barriers to religious practice. Last year Pope Francis proposed a dialogue with Beijing. He said that the Catholic Church “only asks to have freedom to do its work. No other conditions.”
When its freedom to practice is protected, the Catholic Church typically is not a revolutionary force. To the contrary, in much of the world it is one of the most important advocates for social stability.
China is increasingly influencing Asia and the world, but it will in turn be influenced by developments within. One of those is religion. The government would best respond in a way that accommodates increased religious faith.
Doug Bandow is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute and served as a special assistant to former US president Ronald Reagan.
The bird flu outbreak at US dairy farms keeps finding alarming new ways to surprise scientists. Last week, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed that H5N1 is spreading not just from birds to herds, but among cows. Meanwhile, media reports say that an unknown number of cows are asymptomatic. Although the risk to humans is still low, it is clear that far more work needs to be done to get a handle on the reach of the virus and how it is being transmitted. That would require the USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to get
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
Former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) used to push for reforms to protect Taiwan by adopting the “three noes” policy as well as “Taiwanization.” Later, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) wished to save the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) by pushing for the party’s “localization,” hoping to compete with homegrown political parties as a pro-Taiwan KMT. However, the present-day members of the KMT do not know what they are talking about, and do not heed the two former presidents’ words, so the party has suffered a third consecutive defeat in the January presidential election. Soon after gaining power with the help of the KMT’s