In last year’s nine-in-one local elections, Taiwanese voted against the China-friendly cross-strait policies that the President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) administration has pushed over the past six-and-a-half years.
Following the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) trouncing at the polls, a dejected Ma stepped down as KMT chairman and his Cabinet resigned en masse.
Having lost public support, the Ma administration will be no more than a caretaker government for the year-and-a-half that it has left in office. In view of this, it ought to rein in its pro-China policies and change tack.
However, the caretaker Cabinet is not just persisting with such policies, but prioritizing them.
Since Ma came into office in 2008, his government has promoted integration with China through a “one China common market.”
Cross-Straits Common Market Foundation chairman and former vice president Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) said the future common market will pursue further economic integration within the WTO framework and bring about full liberalization of cross-strait exchanges of goods, personnel, capital, services and information, and eventually go on to achieve complete harmony of economic policies and monetary union.
Reports published on Jan. 30 said that although the draft law on oversight of cross-strait negotiations remains stuck in the legislature, negotiations on the proposed cross-strait trade in goods agreement are moving ahead.
The service trade agreement, signed in June 2013, has not yet been approved by the legislature, which must happen before it can come into effect.
That has not stopped the Cross-Strait Economic Cooperation Committee, set up under the terms of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, from discussing follow-up arrangements for the service trade agreement. In effect, the authorities have jumped the gun on both agreements.
The KMT’s defeat in the elections was largely due to the Ma administration’s efforts to push the service trade agreement through the legislature, prompting the rise of the student-led Sunflower movement. Yet even now it still wants to jump the gun on these agreements. Why is the lame-duck government in such a rush?
The President Chain Store Corp, which operates 7-Eleven convenience stores, recently announced that, since Sunday last week, three of its stores would provide currency exchange services between Chinese yuan and New Taiwan dollars.
The Taiwan Solidarity Union’s legislative caucus organized a news conference in protest, but the Democratic Progressive Party has said nothing and seems completely unaware of the implications.
The central bank, which is responsible for managing foreign exchange business, has not said anything either.
According to the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (管理外匯條例), the authority in charge of foreign exchange business is the central bank, one of its duties being to authorize and supervise banks engaging in foreign exchange operations. President’s 7-Eleven stores are not banks, so having them provide currency exchange services clearly contravenes the terms of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act.
Why, then, has there been no reaction from the central bank? Is it asleep or in a trance?
If big quantities of yuan start circulating in Taiwan, it is likely to have a big impact on Taiwan’s monetary sovereignty.
Are Taiwanese going to see Siew’s idea of “eventually” achieving complete harmony of economic policies and monetary union become a reality much sooner than even he foresaw?
Wang To-far is a part-time professor of economics at National Taipei University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS