It was nearly one year ago when Minister of Finance Chang Sheng-ford (張盛和) made public his fiscal reform package — which includes raising the business tax for banking and insurance institutions as well as increasing consolidated income tax on high-income groups — as the ministry aimed to increase the nation’s tax revenue to about NT$80 billion (US$2.54 billion) per year and narrow the government’s budget gap.
At that time, Chang said fiscal reforms had to be taken step by step, and added that reforming the property tax could be the next step if the nation is to achieve long-term fiscal soundness.
Chang did not disappoint the people who supported him, despite worries from others fearing his measures would force funds to flow out of real-estate investments. According to the government’s latest tax income data, the national treasury collected a record NT$1.96 trillion in tax revenues last year, 4.8 percent higher than the ministry’s budget target and a record high.
Chang’s active promotion of tough tax reforms prompted The Banker, an English-language monthly owned by The Financial Times Ltd, last month to crown him “Finance Minister of the Year.” The UK magazine praised Chang, the first minister from Taiwan to win the award, for making efforts to address worsening income disparity and housing unaffordability.
Certainly, there are people who do not think Chang deserves the award. However, there is no doubt that the high cost of housing in Taipei and a rising wealth gap have created considerable political support for his tax reforms. Recent polls have indicated that most people would like the ministry to apply an effective capital gains tax on the sale of properties, with tax based on the actual transaction price instead of the government-assessed value, in a bid to ease the problem of housing affordability, which has been exacerbated in recent years by not only rising housing prices, but also by stagnant wage growth.
Therefore, if the ministry were to water down its draft combined tax on house and land sales to a flat rate of 17 percent that reportedly applied only to housing bought after 2011, rather than an original proposal with progressive tax rates ranging from 5 to 45 percent, the planned measure is unlikely to effectively curb housing prices more than the existing luxury tax, which is a special sales levy of between 10 and 15 percent on houses resold within two years of purchase, nor the mortgage lending limits on domestic lenders imposed by the central bank.
Moreover, this reportedly lighter taxation would create a new wave of real-estate speculation because it would actually reduce the investment costs for short-term speculators after the phase-out of luxury tax — as the tax base for the former is capital gains, and transaction price for the latter.
This potential change in policy on the single annual tax applicable to the sale of both land and houses leaves a lot of questions unanswered, regarding what caused Chang to change his mind and whether the government has the determination to fulfill the principle of fair and reasonable tax reforms.
The ministry is expected to announce the details of the combined tax proposal before the Lunar New Year, along with supplementary measures and other tax reductions and exemptions for property owners. Chang has long believed that tax reforms could be a powerful tool to stabilize Taiwan’s property market and achieve a fairer and more equitable society. However, if he cannot withstand the backlash from some lawmakers and the Cabinet, the fate of the planned property tax measure would be just like the capital gains tax on securities transaction — the government would try to impose fair taxation on stock investments, but to no avail. In addition, his reforms could lead to little additional tax revenues, and a further loss of public confidence in the government.
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
Legislators of the opposition parties, consisting of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), on Friday moved to initiate impeachment proceedings against President William Lai (賴清德). They accused Lai of undermining the nation’s constitutional order and democracy. For anyone who has been paying attention to the actions of the KMT and the TPP in the legislature since they gained a combined majority in February last year, pushing through constitutionally dubious legislation, defunding the Control Yuan and ensuring that the Constitutional Court is unable to operate properly, such an accusation borders the absurd. That they are basing this
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) was on Monday last week invited to give a talk to students of Soochow University, but her responses to questions raised by students and lecturers became a controversial incident and sparked public discussion over the following days. The student association of the university’s Department of Political Science, which hosted the event, on Saturday issued a statement urging people to stop “doxxing,” harassing and attacking the students who raised questions at the event, and called for rational discussion of the talk. Criticism should be directed at viewpoints, opinions or policies, not students, they said, adding
RSS